822 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16990450)
1. NIH funding of the independent investigator.
Boron WF
Physiology (Bethesda); 2006 Oct; 21():300-1. PubMed ID: 16990450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
Zerhouni EA
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research funding. Structural disequilibria in biomedical research.
Teitelbaum MS
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5889):644-5. PubMed ID: 18669847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stat bite: NIH, NCI appropriations, 1997-2007.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):376. PubMed ID: 16537826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Declines in NIH R01 research grant funding.
Mandel HG; Vesell ES
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):189. PubMed ID: 18845728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. NIH, related agencies face flat budget future.
Finkelstein JB
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):376-7. PubMed ID: 16537827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Increasing R01 competition concerns researchers.
Vastag B
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Oct; 98(20):1436-8. PubMed ID: 17047187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Iceberg alert for NIH.
Bourne HR; Lively MO
Science; 2012 Jul; 337(6093):390. PubMed ID: 22767896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
Max MB
J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. NIH career awards. Young scientists get a helping hand.
Bhatttacharjee Y
Science; 2005 Dec; 310(5754):1601. PubMed ID: 16339420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NIH budget. Boom and bust.
Couzin J; Miller G
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5823):356-61. PubMed ID: 17446363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. NIH funding reform.
Strauss JF
Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5736):851. PubMed ID: 16081700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Grants on the run.
Jeyaseelan S
Science; 2009 Jan; 323(5912):337. PubMed ID: 19150826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. NIH funding: what does the future look like?
Werner MH
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. PubMed ID: 17436447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Microbiology. Détente declared on NIH biodefense funding.
Kaiser J
Science; 2005 May; 308(5724):938. PubMed ID: 15890854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Why aren't there more scientists advocating for funding?
Wells RD; Farnham P
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1081. PubMed ID: 17110554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. U.S. science and austerity. Darwinism vs. social engineering at NIH.
Kaiser J
Science; 2011 Nov; 334(6057):753-4. PubMed ID: 22076357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Invest in postdocs.
Hoff KG
Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):880. PubMed ID: 19443765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
