These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1699047)

  • 1. [A comparative study of two commercial systems for the enzymatic identification of enterobacteriaceae].
    Sokolova KIa; Likhacheva AIu; Brusnigina NF; Men'shikov DD
    Lab Delo; 1990; (6):64-6. PubMed ID: 1699047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Identification of enteric bacteria using the ENTEROtest 1 and 2 and the ENTERO-Rapid systems].
    Sedlácek I; Pakrová E
    Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1992 Aug; 41(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 1388100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using SIB and API kits to identify and biotype enterobacteria of different origin.
    Kulinich LI; Fish NG; Mazitova OP; Dratvin SA; Birger MO
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3316379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli.
    O'Hara CM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Identification of reference strains of intestinal bacteria using the TNW, IDENTI and NIS 86 numeric identification systems].
    Pácová Z; Urbanová E
    Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1993 Jun; 42(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 8348622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Minitek test system with a conventional screening procedure for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Hanson CW; Marso E; Martin WJ
    Health Lab Sci; 1978 Jan; 15(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 346535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of the usefulness of commercial systems Quantum II and Rapid ID 32E for quick identification of rods from the Enterobacteriaceae family].
    Kałuzewski S
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1994; 46(4):247-58. PubMed ID: 7603126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Application of a computer program for identifying different genera and species of the Enterobacteriaceae family in clinical bacteriology].
    Soubes M; Cobelli S; Borthagaray G; Bresciano N; Cerdeiras P
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 1990; 22(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 2287715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The identification and comparison of gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative bacteria by the conventional manual method and the Quantum II microbiology system].
    Akyön Y; Baykal M
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 1988 Jan; 22(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 3078791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Minibact, a new system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison of Minibact, Micro-ID and API 20E with a conventional method as reference.
    Kjaeldgaard P; Nissen B; Lange N; Laursen H
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1986 Apr; 94(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 3524112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Izard D; Gavini F; Ochin D; Enayeh E; Leclerc H
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1980 Dec; 28(10):681-4. PubMed ID: 7008005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Utility of pyrrolidonyl-arylamidase detection for typing Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria].
    Nicola F; Centorbi H; Bantar C; Smayevsky J; Bianchini H
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 1995; 27(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 8850133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative study of various API galeries for the identification of gram negative bacteria].
    Reynaud AE; Coude Du Foresto B; Courtieu AL
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1988; 46(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 3291654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simple scheme for identification of common species of enterobacteriaceae.
    Agrawal GN; Ahmad S; Kokate SB; Jalgaonkar SV
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2006 Oct; 49(4):626-30. PubMed ID: 17183881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the MIC 2000 enteric media with API 20 E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Courcol RJ; Husson MO; Izard DE; Martin GR
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Sep; 252(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 6758421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mathematical approach to bacterial identification].
    Beyne P; Piette F; Simon G; Fichefet J; Leclercq JP
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1985; 43(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 3896052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enterobacteriaceae and other gram negative bacteria in the water of lakes used as open air baths around the city of Bratislava.
    Krcméry V
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1983 Apr; 177(3-4):334-41. PubMed ID: 6367303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P; Carbone M; Fera MT; Teti G
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of multiple-test systems for the presumptive identification of enterobacteriaceae.
    Goldin M
    Am J Med Technol; 1972 Aug; 38(8):288-91. PubMed ID: 4563216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the Micro-ID system (author's transl)].
    Peuckert W; Pelz K
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Aug; 247(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 6999799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.