BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16991010)

  • 21. A computer-aided detection of the architectural distortion in digital mammograms using the fractal dimension measurements of BEMD.
    Zyout I; Togneri R
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Dec; 70():173-184. PubMed ID: 29691123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
    Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of normal tissue context in computer-aided detection of masses in mammograms.
    Hupse R; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Dec; 28(12):2033-41. PubMed ID: 19666331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
    Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An observer study comparing spot imaging regions selected by radiologists and a computer for an automated stereo spot mammography technique.
    Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Lydick JT; Gandra CR; Chen NG; Helvie MA; Bailey JE; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Sahiner B; Petrick NA
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1558-67. PubMed ID: 15259660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
    Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):190. PubMed ID: 29071592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet filter and Markov random field model.
    Yu SN; Li KY; Huang YK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Apr; 30(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 16723208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
    Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast peripheral area correction in digital mammograms.
    Tortajada M; Oliver A; Martí R; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Sentís M; Freixenet J; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jul; 50():32-40. PubMed ID: 24845018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
    Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Early detection and classification of abnormality in prior mammograms using image-to-image translation and YOLO techniques.
    Baccouche A; Garcia-Zapirain B; Zheng Y; Elmaghraby AS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 221():106884. PubMed ID: 35594582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Malignant lesions on mammography: accuracy of two different computer-aided detection systems.
    Lobbes M; Smidt M; Keymeulen K; Girometti R; Zuiani C; Beets-Tan R; Wildberger J; Boetes C
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 23465980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimizing Case-based detection performance in a multiview CAD system for mammography.
    Samulski M; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Apr; 30(4):1001-9. PubMed ID: 21233045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support.
    Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Rijken H; Holland R
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S123-6. PubMed ID: 17209117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances.
    Tang J; Rangayyan RM; Xu J; El Naqa I; Yang Y
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Mar; 13(2):236-51. PubMed ID: 19171527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms.
    Kwok SM; Chandrasekhar R; Attikiouzel Y; Rickard MT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1129-40. PubMed ID: 15377122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.