These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16991104)

  • 41. Statistics in biomedical laboratory and clinical science: applications, issues and pitfalls.
    Ludbrook J
    Med Princ Pract; 2008; 17(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 18059094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A generalized weighting regression-derived meta-analysis estimator robust to small-study effects and heterogeneity.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Thompson JR; Ades AE; Abrams KR; Cooper NJ
    Stat Med; 2012 Jun; 31(14):1407-17. PubMed ID: 22351645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Application of Meta-regression and subgroup analyses of heterogeneity disposal in Meta-analysis].
    Shi XQ; Wang ZZ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 May; 29(5):497-501. PubMed ID: 18956686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Meta-analysis of summary survival curve data.
    Arends LR; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4381-96. PubMed ID: 18465839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Investigating trial and treatment heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data by means of the penalized maximum likelihood approach.
    Rondeau V; Michiels S; Liquet B; Pignon JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1894-910. PubMed ID: 18069745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis.
    Hedges LV; Pigott TD
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Sep; 6(3):203-17. PubMed ID: 11570228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data.
    Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 16755545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The conditional relative odds ratio provided less biased results for comparing diagnostic test accuracy in meta-analyses.
    Suzuki S; Moro-oka T; Choudhry NK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):461-9. PubMed ID: 15196616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessing the impact of climate variation on survival in vertebrate populations.
    Grosbois V; Gimenez O; Gaillard JM; Pradel R; Barbraud C; Clobert J; Møller AP; Weimerskirch H
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 Aug; 83(3):357-99. PubMed ID: 18715402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis.
    Hedges LV; Pigott TD
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Dec; 9(4):426-45. PubMed ID: 15598097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 17715249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Graphical exploration of network meta-analysis data: the use of multidimensional scaling.
    Chung H; Lumley T
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 18697844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Meta-analysis and use of tests of heterogeneity in neurosurgery.
    Cheong JY; Van Gelder JM
    J Clin Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 17(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 20056420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Application of repeated-measures analysis of variance and hierarchical linear model in nursing research.
    Shin JH
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 19448525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A model for integrating fixed-, random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses into structural equation modeling.
    Cheung MW
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):182-202. PubMed ID: 18778151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An informed reference prior for between-study heterogeneity in meta-analyses of binary outcomes.
    Pullenayegum EM
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(26):3082-94. PubMed ID: 22020726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.