These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16991104)

  • 61. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: needs, resources and challenges.
    Xu H; Platt RW; Luo ZC; Wei S; Fraser WD
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 22 Suppl 1():18-28. PubMed ID: 18237348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Practical methodology of meta-analysis of individual patient data using a survival outcome.
    Katsahian S; Latouche A; Mary JY; Chevret S; Porcher R
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Mar; 29(2):220-30. PubMed ID: 17884735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
    Wang F; Gatsonis CA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data.
    Riley RD; Lambert PC; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Thijs L; Boutitie F
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1870-93. PubMed ID: 18069721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data.
    Cooper H; Patall EA
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Jun; 14(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 19485627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
    Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis: incorporating the degree of interdependence.
    Cheung SF; Chan DK
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(5):780-91. PubMed ID: 15506860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Meta-analysis: different methods--different conclusions?
    Böckenhoff A; Hartung J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():39-43. PubMed ID: 11187581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The power of the standard test for the presence of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2688-99. PubMed ID: 16374903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Generalized least squares for the synthesis of correlated information.
    Berrington A; Cox DR
    Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):423-31. PubMed ID: 12925509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Statistics for quantifying heterogeneity in univariate and bivariate meta-analyses of binary data: the case of meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.
    Zhou Y; Dendukuri N
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(16):2701-17. PubMed ID: 24903142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Meta-analysis: a case study.
    Briggs DC
    Eval Rev; 2005 Apr; 29(2):87-127. PubMed ID: 15731508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: detecting and dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses.
    Cordero CP; Dans AL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():149-151. PubMed ID: 33483004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. HELOW: a program for testing extreme homogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Zintzaras E; Ioannidis JP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Nov; 117(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 25023534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Alternative measures of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Reducing the impact of outlying studies.
    Lin L; Chu H; Hodges JS
    Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):156-166. PubMed ID: 27167143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The pooling of data and statistical tests for heterogeneity.
    Polterauer S; Brunnmayr G; Seebacher V; Alkan G; Daraei S; Feichtinger W
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Jul; 84(1):263; author reply 263-4. PubMed ID: 16009203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The effect of the heterogeneity variance estimator on some tests of treatment efficacy.
    Makambi KH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2004 May; 14(2):439-49. PubMed ID: 15206538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Assessment of disagreement: a new information-based approach.
    Costa-Santos C; Antunes L; Souto A; Bernardes J
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):555-61. PubMed ID: 20538199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Change from baseline and analysis of covariance revisited.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4334-44. PubMed ID: 16921578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.