BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16995750)

  • 1. Simulation of impact test for determining "health" of percutaneous bone anchored implants.
    Jones S; Faulkner G; Raboud D; Fyfe K; Wolfaardt J
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):647-53. PubMed ID: 16995750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A dynamic analytical model for impact evaluation of percutaneous implants.
    Swain R; Faulkner G; Raboud D; Wolfaardt J
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051013. PubMed ID: 19045520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the effects of cyclic transversal forces on osseointegrated dental implants: experimental and finite element shakedown analyses.
    Genna F
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Apr; 6(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 12745428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design optimization of functionally graded dental implant.
    Hedia HS; Mahmoud NA
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 15156104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Tu MG; Shen YW; Wu CL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 35(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 18321264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Activation of CB2 cannabinoid receptors: a novel therapeutic strategy to accelerate osseointegration of dental implants.
    Qian H; Jin Z; Li S; Huo N; Han C; Sang H
    Med Hypotheses; 2009 Mar; 72(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 19027245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale?
    Maeda Y; Miura J; Taki I; Sogo M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 17608737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of osseointegration degree and pattern on resonance frequency in the assessment of dental implant stability using finite element analysis.
    Deng B; Tan KB; Liu GR; Lu Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1082-8. PubMed ID: 19216277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface.
    Canay S; Akça K
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19509534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Natural frequency analysis of osseointegration for trans-femoral implant.
    Shao F; Xu W; Crocombe A; Ewins D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 35(5):817-24. PubMed ID: 17377843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A numerical approach to resonance frequency analysis for the investigation of oral implant osseointegration.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Schileo E; Williams KR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 33(9):674-81. PubMed ID: 16922741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.