BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16995750)

  • 21. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [3D finite element analysis of bone stress around distally osseointegrated implant for artificial limb attachment].
    Zheng L; Luo J; Wang X; Chen J; Gu Z; Zhang X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 24(3):554-7. PubMed ID: 17713260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dynamic measurement of soft tissue viscoelastic properties with a torsional resonator device.
    Valtorta D; Mazza E
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Oct; 9(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 16006169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Extended push-out test to characterize the failure of bone-implant interface].
    Brandt J; Bierögel C; Holweg K; Hein W; Grellmann W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Jun; 50(6):201-6. PubMed ID: 16003922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
    Norton MR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Numerical simulation of bone regeneration in a bone chamber.
    Geris L; Vandamme K; Naert I; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H
    J Dent Res; 2009 Feb; 88(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19278988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The force attenuation provided by hip protectors depends on impact velocity, pelvic size, and soft tissue stiffness.
    Laing AC; Robinovitch SN
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Dec; 130(6):061005. PubMed ID: 19045534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An improved impact technique for monitoring percutaneous implant integrity.
    Swain R; Faulkner G; Raboud D; Wolfaardt J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 18548922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Finite element analysis of the penetrations of shear and normal vibrations into the soft tissues in a fingertip.
    Wu JZ; Welcome DE; Krajnak K; Dong RG
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jul; 29(6):718-27. PubMed ID: 16962362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The resonance frequencies and mode shapes of dental implants: Rigid body behaviour versus bending behaviour. A numerical approach.
    Pattijn V; Van Lierde C; Van der Perre G; Naert I; Vander Sloten J
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(5):939-47. PubMed ID: 16488232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A finite element analysis of stress distribution in bone tissue surrounding uncoupled or splinted dental implants.
    Bergkvist G; Simonsson K; Rydberg K; Johansson F; Dérand T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 18254739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Finite element simulation of ultrasonic wave propagation in a dental implant for biomechanical stability assessment.
    Vayron R; Nguyen VH; Bosc R; Naili S; Haïat G
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Oct; 14(5):1021-32. PubMed ID: 25619479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
    Eliasson A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (197):3-95. PubMed ID: 18652085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prospective clinical evaluation of 1920 Morse taper connection implants: results after 4 years of functional loading.
    Mangano C; Mangano F; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; Mangano A; La Colla L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 19397637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The use and abuse of the Periotest for 2-piece implant/abutment systems.
    Faulkner MG; Giannitsios D; Lipsett AW; Wolfaardt JF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 11515995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [A biomechanical study of the mechanical stress transmission of dental implants using finite element analysis. Review of literature. Part I].
    Szucs A; Divinyi T; Lorincz A
    Fogorv Sz; 2006 Aug; 99(4):141-7. PubMed ID: 17016921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A computational model for stress reduction at the skin-implant interface of osseointegrated prostheses.
    Yerneni S; Dhaher Y; Kuiken TA
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2012 Apr; 100(4):911-7. PubMed ID: 22275149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.