These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16996194)

  • 1. A randomised controlled trial of the effect of biphasic or monophasic waveform on the incidence and severity of cutaneous burns following external direct current cardioversion.
    Ambler JJ; Deakin CD
    Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 16996194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The incidence and severity of cutaneous burns following external DC cardioversion.
    Ambler JJ; Sado DM; Zideman DA; Deakin CD
    Resuscitation; 2004 Jun; 61(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 15172706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory cream on the incidence and severity of cutaneous burns following external DC cardioversion.
    Ambler JJ; Zideman DA; Deakin CD
    Resuscitation; 2005 May; 65(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 15866397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized controlled trial of efficacy and ST change following use of the Welch-Allyn MRL PIC biphasic waveform versus damped sine monophasic waveform for external DC cardioversion.
    Ambler JJ; Deakin CD
    Resuscitation; 2006 Nov; 71(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 16987583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of prophylactic topical steroid cream on the incidence and severity of cutaneous burns following external DC cardioversion.
    Ambler JJ; Zideman DA; Deakin CD
    Resuscitation; 2005 May; 65(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 15866398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post-shock myocardial stunning: a prospective randomised double-blind comparison of monophasic and biphasic waveforms.
    Deakin CD; Ambler JJ
    Resuscitation; 2006 Mar; 68(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 16378672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized trial comparing monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
    Koster RW; Dorian P; Chapman FW; Schmitt PW; O'Grady SG; Walker RG
    Am Heart J; 2004 May; 147(5):e20. PubMed ID: 15131555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
    Gurevitz OT; Ammash NM; Malouf JF; Chandrasekaran K; Rosales AG; Ballman KV; Hammill SC; White RD; Gersh BJ; Friedman PA
    Am Heart J; 2005 Feb; 149(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 15846271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biphasic versus monophasic shock for external cardioversion of atrial flutter: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Mortensen K; Risius T; Schwemer TF; Aydin MA; Köster R; Klemm HU; Lutomsky B; Meinertz T; Ventura R; Willems S
    Cardiology; 2008; 111(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 18239394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in transthoracic impedance during sequential biphasic defibrillation.
    Deakin CD; Ambler JJ; Shaw S
    Resuscitation; 2008 Aug; 78(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 18486297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the rectilinear biphasic waveform with the monophasic damped sine waveform for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter.
    Niebauer MJ; Brewer JE; Chung MK; Tchou PJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 93(12):1495-9. PubMed ID: 15194019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Transthoracic cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison of three different waveforms].
    Santomauro M; Borrelli A; Ottaviano L; Costanzo A; Monteforte N; Duilio C; Chiariello M
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2004 Jan; 5(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 15253143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.
    Ricard P; Lévy S; Boccara G; Lakhal E; Bardy G
    Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 11333061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A trial of self-adhesive patch electrodes and hand-held paddle electrodes for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (MOBIPAPA).
    Kirchhof P; Mönnig G; Wasmer K; Heinecke A; Breithardt G; Eckardt L; Böcker D
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Jul; 26(13):1292-7. PubMed ID: 15734772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biphasic energy selection for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. The BEST AF Trial.
    Glover BM; Walsh SJ; McCann CJ; Moore MJ; Manoharan G; Dalzell GW; McAllister A; McClements B; McEneaney DJ; Trouton TG; Mathew TP; Adgey AA
    Heart; 2008 Jul; 94(7):884-7. PubMed ID: 17591649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Ambulatory electrocardioversion of atrial fibrillation by means of biphasic versus monophasic shock delivery. A prospective randomized study].
    Neumann T; Erdogan A; Reiner C; Siemon G; Kurzidim K; Berkowitsch A; Kuniss M; Sperzel J; Hamm CW; Pitschner HF
    Z Kardiol; 2004 May; 93(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 15160273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator systems: a randomized comparison of monophasic and biphasic shock energy application.
    Manegold JC; Israel CW; Ehrlich JR; Duray G; Pajitnev D; Wegener FT; Hohnloser SH
    Eur Heart J; 2007 Jul; 28(14):1731-8. PubMed ID: 17569681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Serum troponin I and myoglobin after monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic shocks for cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Kosior DA; Opolski G; Tadeusiak W; Chwyczko T; Wozakowska-Kaplon B; Stawicki S; Filipak KJ; Rabczenko D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():S128-32. PubMed ID: 15683479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Activation of generalised inflammatory reaction following electrical cardioversion.
    Gajek J; Zyśko D; Mysiak A; Mazurek W
    Kardiol Pol; 2004 Sep; 61(9):225-31. PubMed ID: 15531934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: advantages of the transthoracic biphasic method].
    Carunchio A; Burattini M; Coletta C; Pandolfo L; Porzio A; Zecchini F; Ceci V
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2002 Jun; 3(6):638-45. PubMed ID: 12116814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.