219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16996194)
1. A randomised controlled trial of the effect of biphasic or monophasic waveform on the incidence and severity of cutaneous burns following external direct current cardioversion.
Ambler JJ; Deakin CD
Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 16996194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The incidence and severity of cutaneous burns following external DC cardioversion.
Ambler JJ; Sado DM; Zideman DA; Deakin CD
Resuscitation; 2004 Jun; 61(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 15172706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory cream on the incidence and severity of cutaneous burns following external DC cardioversion.
Ambler JJ; Zideman DA; Deakin CD
Resuscitation; 2005 May; 65(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 15866397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized controlled trial of efficacy and ST change following use of the Welch-Allyn MRL PIC biphasic waveform versus damped sine monophasic waveform for external DC cardioversion.
Ambler JJ; Deakin CD
Resuscitation; 2006 Nov; 71(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 16987583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of prophylactic topical steroid cream on the incidence and severity of cutaneous burns following external DC cardioversion.
Ambler JJ; Zideman DA; Deakin CD
Resuscitation; 2005 May; 65(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 15866398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Post-shock myocardial stunning: a prospective randomised double-blind comparison of monophasic and biphasic waveforms.
Deakin CD; Ambler JJ
Resuscitation; 2006 Mar; 68(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 16378672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized trial comparing monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
Koster RW; Dorian P; Chapman FW; Schmitt PW; O'Grady SG; Walker RG
Am Heart J; 2004 May; 147(5):e20. PubMed ID: 15131555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
Gurevitz OT; Ammash NM; Malouf JF; Chandrasekaran K; Rosales AG; Ballman KV; Hammill SC; White RD; Gersh BJ; Friedman PA
Am Heart J; 2005 Feb; 149(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 15846271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biphasic versus monophasic shock for external cardioversion of atrial flutter: a prospective, randomized trial.
Mortensen K; Risius T; Schwemer TF; Aydin MA; Köster R; Klemm HU; Lutomsky B; Meinertz T; Ventura R; Willems S
Cardiology; 2008; 111(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 18239394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in transthoracic impedance during sequential biphasic defibrillation.
Deakin CD; Ambler JJ; Shaw S
Resuscitation; 2008 Aug; 78(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 18486297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the rectilinear biphasic waveform with the monophasic damped sine waveform for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter.
Niebauer MJ; Brewer JE; Chung MK; Tchou PJ
Am J Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 93(12):1495-9. PubMed ID: 15194019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Transthoracic cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison of three different waveforms].
Santomauro M; Borrelli A; Ottaviano L; Costanzo A; Monteforte N; Duilio C; Chiariello M
Ital Heart J Suppl; 2004 Jan; 5(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 15253143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.
Ricard P; Lévy S; Boccara G; Lakhal E; Bardy G
Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 11333061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A trial of self-adhesive patch electrodes and hand-held paddle electrodes for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (MOBIPAPA).
Kirchhof P; Mönnig G; Wasmer K; Heinecke A; Breithardt G; Eckardt L; Böcker D
Eur Heart J; 2005 Jul; 26(13):1292-7. PubMed ID: 15734772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biphasic energy selection for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. The BEST AF Trial.
Glover BM; Walsh SJ; McCann CJ; Moore MJ; Manoharan G; Dalzell GW; McAllister A; McClements B; McEneaney DJ; Trouton TG; Mathew TP; Adgey AA
Heart; 2008 Jul; 94(7):884-7. PubMed ID: 17591649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ambulatory electrocardioversion of atrial fibrillation by means of biphasic versus monophasic shock delivery. A prospective randomized study].
Neumann T; Erdogan A; Reiner C; Siemon G; Kurzidim K; Berkowitsch A; Kuniss M; Sperzel J; Hamm CW; Pitschner HF
Z Kardiol; 2004 May; 93(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 15160273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator systems: a randomized comparison of monophasic and biphasic shock energy application.
Manegold JC; Israel CW; Ehrlich JR; Duray G; Pajitnev D; Wegener FT; Hohnloser SH
Eur Heart J; 2007 Jul; 28(14):1731-8. PubMed ID: 17569681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Serum troponin I and myoglobin after monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic shocks for cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation.
Kosior DA; Opolski G; Tadeusiak W; Chwyczko T; Wozakowska-Kaplon B; Stawicki S; Filipak KJ; Rabczenko D
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():S128-32. PubMed ID: 15683479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Activation of generalised inflammatory reaction following electrical cardioversion.
Gajek J; Zyśko D; Mysiak A; Mazurek W
Kardiol Pol; 2004 Sep; 61(9):225-31. PubMed ID: 15531934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: advantages of the transthoracic biphasic method].
Carunchio A; Burattini M; Coletta C; Pandolfo L; Porzio A; Zecchini F; Ceci V
Ital Heart J Suppl; 2002 Jun; 3(6):638-45. PubMed ID: 12116814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
