132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16998825)
1. Non-adaptive evolution of genome complexity.
Yi SV
Bioessays; 2006 Oct; 28(10):979-82. PubMed ID: 16998825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005. Mutation rate and the cost of complexity.
Haygood R;
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 May; 23(5):957-63. PubMed ID: 16469852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evolution of genome size: multilevel selection, mutation bias or dynamical chaos?
Vinogradov AE
Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2004 Dec; 14(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 15531156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The mutation matrix and the evolution of evolvability.
Jones AG; Arnold SJ; Bürger R
Evolution; 2007 Apr; 61(4):727-45. PubMed ID: 17439608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rate of adaptive peak shifts with partial genetic robustness.
Kim Y
Evolution; 2007 Aug; 61(8):1847-56. PubMed ID: 17683428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of epistasis and the evolution of genetic architecture: exact results for a 2-locus model.
Alvarez-Castro JM; Kopp M; Hermisson J
Theor Popul Biol; 2009; 75(2-3):109-22. PubMed ID: 19167413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The molecular signature of selection underlying human adaptations.
Harris EE; Meyer D
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006; Suppl 43():89-130. PubMed ID: 17103426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Suppes predicate for genetics and natural selection.
Magalhães JC; Krause D
J Theor Biol; 2001 Mar; 209(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 11401456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intrinsically driven changes in gene interaction complexity. I. Growth of regulatory complexes and increase in number of genes.
Zuckerkandl E
J Mol Evol; 2001; 53(4-5):539-54. PubMed ID: 11675614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift.
de Visser JA; Elena SF
Nat Rev Genet; 2007 Feb; 8(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 17230200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity in cancer: a genome-centric perspective.
Heng HH; Bremer SW; Stevens JB; Ye KJ; Liu G; Ye CJ
J Cell Physiol; 2009 Sep; 220(3):538-47. PubMed ID: 19441078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computation biology: evolution plays dice.
Gerrish P
Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):756-7. PubMed ID: 12490934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The evolution of plant genomes: scaling up from a population perspective.
Flowers JM; Purugganan MD
Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2008 Dec; 18(6):565-70. PubMed ID: 19131240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The rhythm of microbial adaptation.
Gerrish P
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6853):299-302. PubMed ID: 11565030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The long-term evolution of multilocus traits under frequency-dependent disruptive selection.
van Doorn GS; Dieckmann U
Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2226-38. PubMed ID: 17236416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Understanding clustering in type space using field theoretic techniques.
Lawson DJ; Jensen HJ
Bull Math Biol; 2008 May; 70(4):1065-81. PubMed ID: 18231841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive mutations in bacteria: high rate and small effects.
Perfeito L; Fernandes L; Mota C; Gordo I
Science; 2007 Aug; 317(5839):813-5. PubMed ID: 17690297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A powerful regression-based method for admixture mapping of isolation across the genome of hybrids.
Gompert Z; Buerkle CA
Mol Ecol; 2009 Mar; 18(6):1207-24. PubMed ID: 19243513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An adaptive sharing elitist evolution strategy for multiobjective optimization.
Costa L; Oliveira P
Evol Comput; 2003; 11(4):417-38. PubMed ID: 14629865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Population genetic models can be used to study the evolution of the interacting behaviours of parents and their progeny.
Curnow RN; Ayres KL
Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Aug; 72(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 17298838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
