458 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16998980)
1. The health care agent: protecting the choices and interests of patients who lack capacity.
Swidler RN
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1988; 6(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 16998980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Exercising the right to die: a proposal for New York.
Caffera SM
Syracuse Law Rev; 1991; 42(4):1189-240. PubMed ID: 16130264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical surrogacy mediation: expanding patient, family, and physician rights and reformulating the Virginia Health Care Decisions Act.
Moore DJ
Va J Soc Policy Law; 2003; 10(3):410-44. PubMed ID: 15744904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Decision making by surrogates.
Day LJ
Crit Care Nurse; 2000 Apr; 20(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 11873744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
Dippel DL
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law.
Calder M
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The precarious role of the courts: surrogate health care decisionmaking.
Fader JF
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1193-219. PubMed ID: 12599351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A survey of living will and advanced health care directives.
Horttor BJ
N D Law Rev; 1998; 74(2):233-93. PubMed ID: 16437813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Advance care planning.
Gillick MR
N Engl J Med; 2004 Jan; 350(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 14702421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Deja vu all over again: the false dichotomy between sanctity of life and quality of life.
Cantor NL
Stetson Law Rev; 2005; 35(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 17099994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Right to refuse life sustaining medical treatment and the noncompetent nonterminally ill patient: an analysis of abridgment and anarchy.
Adamson EH
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1990; 17(2):461-92. PubMed ID: 16047420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New York enacts surrogate decision-making legislation for incapacitated patients.
Collier R
CMAJ; 2010 May; 182(8):E331-2. PubMed ID: 20403896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Health care representative consent legislation.
Falk TC
Willamette Law Rev; 1990; 26(2):299-343. PubMed ID: 16047453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An Oklahoma perspective: end of life decision-making and termination of treatment.
Burkett TM; Weyrauch S
Tulsa Law J; 2000; 35(3-4):565-81. PubMed ID: 16273679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A time to live, a time to die.
Stiefel LS
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):699-741. PubMed ID: 16144097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. End-of-life lawmaking.
N Y Times Web; 2006 Apr; ():CY17. PubMed ID: 16649279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Redrafting Ohio's advance directive laws.
Martyn SR; Reagan JE; Minogue B; Dippel DL; Schimer MR; Taraszewski R
Akron Law Rev; 1992; 26(2):229-92. PubMed ID: 16506326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The capacity to appoint a proxy and the possibility of concurrent proxy directives.
Kim SY; Appelbaum PS
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 16883617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from minimally conscious patients: who decides?
Anderson BJ
J Med Pract Manage; 2002; 18(2):101-3. PubMed ID: 12389332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Wendland case--withdrawing life support from incompetent patients who are not terminally ill.
Lo B; Dornbrand L; Wolf LE; Groman M
N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(19):1489-93. PubMed ID: 12000822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
