These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16998997)

  • 1. U v W (Attorney General intervening).
    Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, High Court of Justice, Family Division
    Fam Law Rep; 1997; 2():282-303. PubMed ID: 16998997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re R (a Child).
    Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 2003; 2():131-40. PubMed ID: 17024778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rose v Secretary of State for Health and Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
    Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
    Fam Law Rep; 2002; 2():962-80. PubMed ID: 16998998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. R (Quintavalle) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (Secretary of State for Health Intervening).
    Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, Court of Appeal
    Fam Law Rep; 2003; 2():335-72. PubMed ID: 17042105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. R (on the application of Quintavalle) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
    Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, House of Lords
    All Engl Law Rep; 2005; 2():555-70. PubMed ID: 17042106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v A.
    Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
    Fam Law Rep; 2003; 1():1091-110. PubMed ID: 16998996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. R (on the application of Quintavalle) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
    Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 2003; 2():105-12. PubMed ID: 16998995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. R (On the application of Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health.
    Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court
    All Engl Law Rep; 2001; 4():1013-24. PubMed ID: 16998994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. R v. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, ex parte Blood.
    Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1997 Feb; [1997] 2():687-704. PubMed ID: 11648631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More questions than answers? R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority ex parte Blood The Times 7th February 1997.
    Treece SJ; Savas D
    Med Law Int; 1997; 3(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 16121440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. R (On the application of Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health.
    Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 2002; 2():625-39. PubMed ID: 17042107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Buy baby: the European Union and regulation of human reproduction.
    Hervey TK
    Oxf J Leg Stud; 1998; 18(2):207-33. PubMed ID: 16596760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The U.K. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. How it has contributed to the evaluation of assisted reproduction technology.
    Doyle P
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 10407591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of rights and utility in instituting a child's right to know her genetic history.
    Wallbank J
    Soc Leg Stud; 2004 Jun; 13(2):245-64. PubMed ID: 16270466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Access to donor insemination: Canadian ideals--UK law and practice.
    Rennie E
    Med Law Int; 1999; 4(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 15072076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. R (on the application of Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health.
    Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, House of Lords
    All Engl Law Rep; 2003; 2():113-30. PubMed ID: 17042104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
    Hagger L
    Med Law Int; 1997; 3(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 16124132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. United States v. Jacobson.
    United States. District Court. Eastern District of Virginia
    Wests Fed Suppl; 1992; 785():563-9. PubMed ID: 16372436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Embryo research and fertilisation code.
    Walker A
    BMJ; 1991 Mar; 302(6779):746. PubMed ID: 11642876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sperm donor recruitment, attitudes and provider practices--5 years after the removal of donor anonymity.
    Shukla U; Deval B; Jansa Perez M; Hamoda H; Savvas M; Narvekar N
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Mar; 28(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 23315068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.