99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16999255)
1. Frequency-modulation (FM) technology as a method for improving speech perception in noise for individuals with multiple sclerosis.
Lewis MS; Hutter M; Lilly DJ; Bourdette D; Saunders J; Fausti SA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Sep; 17(8):605-16. PubMed ID: 16999255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Some effects of multiple sclerosis on speech perception in noise: Preliminary findings.
Lewis MS; Lilly DJ; Hutter M; Bourdette DN; Saunders J; Fausti SA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2006; 43(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 16847775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a BICROS System with a Directional Microphone in the Receiver and Transmitter.
Valente M; Oeding K
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):856-71. PubMed ID: 26554490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception in noise: directional microphones versus frequency modulation (FM) systems.
Lewis MS; Crandell CC; Valente M; Horn JE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 Jun; 15(6):426-39. PubMed ID: 15341224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
Boothroyd A
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Better speech perception in noise with an assistive multimicrophone array for hearing AIDS.
Luts H; Maj JB; Soede W; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 15599189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
Gravel JS; Fausel N; Liskow C; Chobot J
Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10037061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory rehabilitation after stroke: treatment of auditory processing disorders in stroke patients with personal frequency-modulated (FM) systems.
Koohi N; Vickers D; Chandrashekar H; Tsang B; Werring D; Bamiou DE
Disabil Rehabil; 2017 Mar; 39(6):586-593. PubMed ID: 27008578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cochlear implant microphone location affects speech recognition in diffuse noise.
Kolberg ER; Sheffield SW; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Gifford RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):51-8; quiz 109-10. PubMed ID: 25597460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech recognition and comfort using hearing instruments with adaptive directional characteristics in asymmetric listening conditions.
Mackenzie E; Lutman ME
Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 16378001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
Recker KL; Edwards BW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
Wilson RH; McArdle R
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pure-tone auditory stream segregation and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients.
Hong RS; Turner CW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):360-74. PubMed ID: 16875232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of a reverse cardioid directional microphone.
Kuk F; Keenan D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 22284842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception benefits of FM and infrared devices to children with hearing aids in a typical classroom.
Anderson KL; Goldstein H
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2004 Apr; 35(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15191328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effects of FM and Hearing Aid Microphone Settings, FM Gain, and Ambient Noise Levels on SNR at the Tympanic Membrane.
Norrix LW; Camarota K; Harris FP; Dean J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 26905531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
