These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17000182)

  • 21. The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24): a resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute.
    Subar AF; Kirkpatrick SI; Mittl B; Zimmerman TP; Thompson FE; Bingley C; Willis G; Islam NG; Baranowski T; McNutt S; Potischman N
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2012 Aug; 112(8):1134-7. PubMed ID: 22704899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validating dietary intake with biochemical markers.
    Hardin DS
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Oct; 109(10):1698-9. PubMed ID: 19782167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laboratory data evaluation: how does the renal dietitian interpret results?
    Gonyea J
    Nephrol Nurs J; 2003 Dec; 30(6):666-7. PubMed ID: 14730789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Misreporting of dietary energy, protein, potassium and sodium in relation to body mass index in young Japanese women.
    Murakami K; Sasaki S; Takahashi Y; Uenishi K; Yamasaki M; Hayabuchi H; Goda T; Oka J; Baba K; Ohki K; Kohri T; Watanabe R; Sugiyama Y
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2008 Jan; 62(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 17299459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Financial incentive for diet recall accuracy does not affect reported energy intake or number of underreporters in a sample of overweight females.
    Hendrickson S; Mattes R
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 Jan; 107(1):118-21. PubMed ID: 17197279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A myriad of methods.
    Van Horn L
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 May; 107(5):721. PubMed ID: 17467358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Formative research of a quick list for an automated self-administered 24-hour dietary recall.
    Subar AF; Thompson FE; Potischman N; Forsyth BH; Buday R; Richards D; McNutt S; Hull SG; Guenther PM; Schatzkin A; Baranowski T
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 Jun; 107(6):1002-7. PubMed ID: 17524721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An alternative to dietary data exclusions.
    Nielsen SJ; Adair L
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 May; 107(5):792-9. PubMed ID: 17467374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dietary fiber intake, dietary glycemic index and load, and body mass index: a cross-sectional study of 3931 Japanese women aged 18-20 years.
    Murakami K; Sasaki S; Okubo H; Takahashi Y; Hosoi Y; Itabashi M
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2007 Aug; 61(8):986-95. PubMed ID: 17251928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dietary methodology: implications of errors in the measurement.
    Van Staveren WA; Burema J
    Proc Nutr Soc; 1990 Jul; 49(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 2236092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The pros and cons of using PDAs for dietary self-monitoring.
    Beasley J
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 May; 107(5):739; author reply 739-40. PubMed ID: 17467366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of a food frequency questionnaire for assessing dietary nutrients in Brazilian children 5 to 10 years of age.
    Fumagalli F; Pontes Monteiro J; Sartorelli DS; Vieira MN; de Lourdes Pires Bianchi M
    Nutrition; 2008 May; 24(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 18343639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (NutriSTEP): validation and test-retest reliability of a parent-administered questionnaire assessing nutrition risk of preschoolers.
    Randall Simpson JA; Keller HH; Rysdale LA; Beyers JE
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2008 Jun; 62(6):770-80. PubMed ID: 17554250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire designed for residents in north China.
    Wang X; Sa R; Yan H
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 19114401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Markers for the validation of reported dietary intake in adults with cystic fibrosis.
    Olveira G; Olveira C; Casado-Miranda E; Padilla A; Dorado A; Rojo-Martinez G; Porras N; Garcia-Escobar E; Soriguer F
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Oct; 109(10):1704-11. PubMed ID: 19782169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validity and reproducibility of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for use among pregnant women in rural China.
    Cheng Y; Yan H; Dibley MJ; Shen Y; Li Q; Zeng L
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17(1):166-77. PubMed ID: 18364342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using normalized protein nitrogen appearance (nPNA) in assessing nutrition.
    Abbas K
    Nephrol Nurs J; 2006; 33(6):677-8. PubMed ID: 17219729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Need for technological innovation in dietary assessment.
    Thompson FE; Subar AF; Loria CM; Reedy JL; Baranowski T
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2010 Jan; 110(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 20102826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relative reliability and validity of the Block Kids Questionnaire among youth aged 10 to 17 years.
    Cullen KW; Watson K; Zakeri I
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 May; 108(5):862-6. PubMed ID: 18442512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Invited commentary: a further look at dietary questionnaire validation.
    Willett W
    Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 154(12):1100-2; discussion 1105-6. PubMed ID: 11744512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.