176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17000408)
1. Obviate.
Freeman PB
Optometry; 2006 Oct; 77(10):471-2. PubMed ID: 17000408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The American way: get what you can through the political process.
Newmark E
J Fla Med Assoc; 1989 Nov; 76(11):964-6. PubMed ID: 2592934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Conflicts of law and ethics in the practice of optometry.
Classé JG
J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Jun; 65(6):414-6. PubMed ID: 8089387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonphysician groups push to expand scope of practice.
Carlson B
Manag Care; 2001 Apr; 10(4):19, 23. PubMed ID: 11394362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ophthalmic comanagement and optometry.
Bucar AA
Hindsight; 2014 Apr; 45(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 24941517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Optometrists threaten public safety with bill.
Miura CM
Hawaii Med J; 1996 Jun; 55(6):96. PubMed ID: 8707548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Uniting the profession.
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 1999 Apr; 95(4):32-5. PubMed ID: 10217988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Optometry's scope of practice expansion.
Sabbagh LB
J Refract Surg; 1999; 15(3):377-81. PubMed ID: 10367581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring new paths to reveal today's general practice of optometry.
Adams AJ; Freeman PB
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Sep; 83(9):621. PubMed ID: 16971839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring new paths to reveal today's general practice of optometry.
Freeman PB; Adams AJ
Optometry; 2006 Sep; 77(9):417-8. PubMed ID: 16939883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Wouldn't Charles Prentice be pleased?
Classé JG
J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Sep; 66(9):528. PubMed ID: 7490411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The 2015 Legislative Session is Upon Us.
Pearce HT
J S C Med Assoc; 2015 Jan; 110(4):120. PubMed ID: 27141691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. FTC activity brisk in health care industry.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Mar; 31(9):12. PubMed ID: 10277870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What we think we know and the years ahead.
Haffner AN
Optometry; 2001 Mar; 72(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 11294587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reactive or pro-active medicine.
Hawk JC
J S C Med Assoc; 1991 Sep; 87(9):449. PubMed ID: 1943034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Doctor's plan disqualified for not meeting 70% rule; Sec. 83 triggers taxation.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Sep; 32(3):46, 48. PubMed ID: 10277873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. FTC's rulemaking authority under fire in courts. Congress.
Am Med News; 1979 Sep; 22(37):1, 6. PubMed ID: 10243775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prohibition. The Wets versus the Drys in New Jersey.
Sherk HH
N J Med; 2003 Apr; 100(4):24-7. PubMed ID: 12703334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal and practice standards implications.
Lung C; Shams-Avari P
Radiol Technol; 2006; 77(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 16443936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. American Medical Association attacks on scope of practice: oncology nurses beware.
Paul IH; Decker G
Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2007 Apr; 11(2):179-80. PubMed ID: 17573265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
