These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17001509)

  • 1. Visitor evaluations of management actions at a highly impacted Appalachian Trail camping area.
    Daniels ML; Marion JL
    Environ Manage; 2006 Dec; 38(6):1006-19. PubMed ID: 17001509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling areal measures of campsite impacts on the Appalachian National Scenic Trail to enhance ecological sustainability.
    Arredondo JR; Marion JL; Meadema FP; Wimpey JF
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 279():111693. PubMed ID: 33338772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of campfire impacts and policies in seven protected areas.
    Reid SE; Marion JL
    Environ Manage; 2005 Jul; 36(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 16132449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Management practices that concentrate visitor activities: camping impact management at Isle Royale National Park, USA.
    Marion JL; Farrell TA
    J Environ Manage; 2002 Oct; 66(2):201-12. PubMed ID: 12418164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Twenty years of change on campsites in the backcountry of Grand Canyon National Park.
    Cole DN; Foti P; Brown M
    Environ Manage; 2008 Jun; 41(6):959-70. PubMed ID: 18311497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of visitor use levels on visitor spatial behavior in off-trail areas of dispersed recreation use.
    D'Antonio A; Monz C
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 170():79-87. PubMed ID: 26803258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Recreational Camping on the Environmental Values of National Parks in Sri Lanka.
    Mallikage ST; Perera P; Newsome D; Bandara R; Simpson G
    Trop Life Sci Res; 2021 Sep; 32(3):119-145. PubMed ID: 35656366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing the utility of visitor impact assessment in parks and protected areas: a combined social-ecological approach.
    D'Antonio A; Monz C; Newman P; Lawson S; Taff D
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 124():72-81. PubMed ID: 23624424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is open defaecation in outdoor recreation and camping areas a public health issue in Australia? A literature review.
    Stevenson LC; Allen T; Mendez D; Sellars D; Gould GS
    Health Promot J Austr; 2020 Sep; 31(3):525-532. PubMed ID: 31608519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficacy of combined educational and site management actions in reducing off-trail hiking in an urban-proximate protected area.
    Hockett KS; Marion JL; Leung YF
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 203(Pt 1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28778002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of minimum impact education on visitor spatial behavior in parks and protected areas: An experimental investigation using GPS-based tracking.
    Kidd AM; Monz C; D'Antonio A; Manning RE; Reigner N; Goonan KA; Jacobi C
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Oct; 162():53-62. PubMed ID: 26225933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defining indicators and standards for tourism impacts in protected areas: Cape Range National Park, Australia.
    Moore SA; Polley A
    Environ Manage; 2007 Mar; 39(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 17203342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visitor Response to Management Regulations-A Study Among Recreationists in Southern Norway.
    Vorkinn M
    Environ Manage; 1998 Sep; 22(5):737-46. PubMed ID: 9680541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Valuing setting-based recreation for selected visitors to national forests in the southern United States.
    Sardana K; Bergstrom JC; Bowker JM
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):972-979. PubMed ID: 27687633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Desktop analysis of potential impacts of visitor use: a case study for the highest park in the Southern Hemisphere.
    Barros A; Pickering C; Gudes O
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 150():179-195. PubMed ID: 25500135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An interpretive study of Yosemite National Park visitors' perspectives toward alternative transportation in Yosemite Valley.
    White DD
    Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 39(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 17106793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward the improvement of trail classification in national parks using the recreation opportunity spectrum approach.
    Oishi Y
    Environ Manage; 2013 Jun; 51(6):1126-36. PubMed ID: 23615956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experiential benefits, place meanings, and environmental setting preferences between proximate and distant visitors to a national scenic trail.
    Kil N; Holland SM; Stein TV
    Environ Manage; 2015 May; 55(5):1109-23. PubMed ID: 25579621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visitor perceptions and the shifting social carrying capacity of South Sinai's coral reefs.
    Leujak W; Ormond RF
    Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 39(4):472-89. PubMed ID: 17318694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial patterns of recreation impact on experimental campsites.
    Cole DN; Monz CA
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Jan; 70(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 15125547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.