192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17001554)
1. Extra-amniotic saline infusion increases cesarean risk versus other induction methods and spontaneous labor.
Levey KA; Arslan AA; Funai EF
Am J Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 23(7):435-8. PubMed ID: 17001554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased rates of chorioamnionitis with extra-amniotic saline infusion method of labor induction.
Levey KA; MacKenzie AP; Stephenson C; Bercik R; Kuczynski E; Funai EF
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 103(4):724-8. PubMed ID: 15051565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.
Guinn DA; Davies JK; Jones RO; Sullivan L; Wolf D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 15295370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture.
Bujold E; Blackwell SC; Gauthier RJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 14704239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized trial of prostaglandin E2 gel and extra-amniotic saline infusion with high dose oxytocin for cervical ripening.
Sharami SH; Milani F; Zahiri Z; Mansour-Ghanaei F
Med Sci Monit; 2005 Aug; 11(8):CR381-6. PubMed ID: 16049380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trans-cervical double balloon catheter with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial.
Walfisch A; Mei-Dan E; Hallak M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 May; 28(7):848-53. PubMed ID: 24939630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trial of extra amniotic saline infusion with oxytocin versus prostaglandin E2 pessary for induction of labor.
Mazhar SB; Imran R; Alam K
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Jun; 13(6):317-20. PubMed ID: 12814527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.
Vahratian A; Zhang J; Troendle JF; Sciscione AC; Hoffman MK
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 15802393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the effect of extra-amniotic normal saline infusion alone or in combination with dexamethasone for the induction of labor.
Kashanian M; Fekrat M; Naghghash S; Ansari NS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Feb; 34(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 18226128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complications of labor induction among multiparous women in a community-based hospital system.
Battista L; Chung JH; Lagrew DC; Wing DA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):241.e1-7; discussion 322-3, e1-4. PubMed ID: 17826404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion plus intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for ripening the cervix and inducing labor in patients with unfavorable cervices.
Rouben D; Arias F
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):290-4. PubMed ID: 8336880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery.
Ravasia DJ; Wood SL; Pollard JK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1176-9. PubMed ID: 11084562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors.
Cnattingius R; Höglund B; Kieler H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 May; 84(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 15842210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induction of labor using a foley balloon, with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion.
Karjane NW; Brock EL; Walsh SW
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):234-9. PubMed ID: 16449106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Elective induction of labor: failure to follow guidelines and risk of cesarean delivery.
Le Ray C; Carayol M; Bréart G; Goffinet F;
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(6):657-65. PubMed ID: 17520395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elective induction of labor in multiparous women. Does it increase the risk of cesarean section?
Heinberg EM; Wood RA; Chambers RB
J Reprod Med; 2002 May; 47(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 12063879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Making cervical ripening EASI: a prospective controlled comparison of single versus double balloon catheters.
Mei-Dan E; Walfisch A; Valencia C; Hallak M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Nov; 27(17):1765-70. PubMed ID: 24397244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elective induction of labor and the risk of cesarean section in low-risk parous women: a cohort study.
Jonsson M; Cnattingius S; Wikström AK
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Feb; 92(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 23157554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short stature--an independent risk factor for Cesarean delivery.
Sheiner E; Levy A; Katz M; Mazor M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jun; 120(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 15925047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
