BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17001554)

  • 21. Correlation among amniotic fluid index (AFI), cesarean section rate, and labor length in inducted pregnancies beyond 41 weeks' gestation with unfavorable cervix.
    Rizzo N; Farina A; Santarsiero G; Morano D; Vitarelli M; Caramelli E; Carinci P; Bovicelli L
    Am J Perinatol; 2000; 17(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 11144315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores.
    Gelisen O; Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Ozdas E; Dilbaz B; Ozdas E; Haberal A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jun; 120(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15925045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study.
    Jonsson M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():136. PubMed ID: 26077416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor.
    Peregrine E; O'Brien P; Omar R; Jauniaux E
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):227-33. PubMed ID: 16449105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Indicated labor induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 increases the risk of cesarean section even in multiparous women with no previous cesarean section.
    Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Bar J; Glickman H; Kaplan B; Hod M
    J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15008383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rupture of the scarred uterus.
    Grossetti E; Vardon D; Creveuil C; Herlicoviez M; Dreyfus M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(5):572-8. PubMed ID: 17464586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
    Ennen CS; Bofill JA; Magann EF; Bass JD; Chauhan SP; Morrison JC
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 67(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 18971583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Complications of trans-cervical Foley catheter for labor induction among 1,083 women.
    Maslovitz S; Lessing JB; Many A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Mar; 281(3):473-7. PubMed ID: 19488776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Single indications of induction of labor with prostaglandins and risk of cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.
    Gerli S; Favilli A; Giordano C; Bini V; Di Renzo GC
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 May; 39(5):926-31. PubMed ID: 23379910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction.
    Nuthalapaty FS; Rouse DJ; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 14990405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Pettker CM; Pocock SB; Smok DP; Lee SM; Devine PC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1320-6. PubMed ID: 18515515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of labor induction on cesarean section rates in diabetic pregnancies.
    Levy AL; Gonzalez JL; Rappaport VJ; Curet LB; Rayburn WF
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Nov; 47(11):931-2. PubMed ID: 12497683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The impact of duration of labor induction on cesarean rate.
    Michelson KA; Carr DB; Easterling TR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):299.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18771990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age.
    Caughey AB; Nicholson JM; Cheng YW; Lyell DJ; Washington AE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):700-5. PubMed ID: 16949399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Induction of labor with prostaglandins for medical reasons: determining explanatory variables of the induction to delivery time interval for vaginal deliveries and caesarean section.
    Braems G; Norhausen I
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Dec; 135(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 17240033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 at preterm.
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Hadar E; Hod M; Ben-Haroush A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 18158629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Term and postterm low-risk pregnancies: management schemes for the reduction of high rates of cesarean section.
    Mancuso S; Ferrazzani S; De Carolis S; Carducci B; De Santis L; Caruso A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1996 Mar; 48(3):95-8. PubMed ID: 8684694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative study of induction of labor in nulliparous women with premature rupture of membranes at term compared to those with intact membranes: duration of labor and mode of delivery.
    Park KH; Hong JS; Ko JK; Cho YK; Lee CM; Choi H; Kim BR
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Oct; 32(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 16984515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
    Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.