These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17002142)

  • 1. Evolution of the low contact stress (LCS) complete knee system.
    Crossett L
    Orthopedics; 2006 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):S17-22. PubMed ID: 17002142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in patellofemoral contact stresses between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a dynamic in vitro measurement.
    Skwara A; Tibesku CO; Ostermeier S; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Fuchs-Winkelmann S
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Jul; 129(7):901-7. PubMed ID: 18825394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low contact stress (LCS) complete knee system in revision surgery.
    Lippe CN; Crossett LS
    Orthopedics; 2006 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):S86-92. PubMed ID: 17002159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of polyethylene degradation in mobile bearing knees: a retrieval analysis of the Anterior-Posterior-Glide (APG) and Rotating Platform (RP) Low Contact Stress (LCS) knee.
    Kop AM; Swarts E
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Jun; 78(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 17611851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro.
    Nicholls RL; Schirm AC; Jeffcote BO; Kuster MS
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1506-12. PubMed ID: 17568418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rationale for the posterior-stabilized rotating-platform knee.
    Maniar R
    Orthopedics; 2006 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):S23-7. PubMed ID: 17002143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bearing surface design changes affect contact patterns in total knee arthroplasty.
    Cottrell JM; Townsend E; Lipman J; Sculco TP; Wright TM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Nov; 464():127-31. PubMed ID: 18062045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical wear measurement on low contact stress rotating platform knee bearings.
    Atwood SA; Currier JH; Mayor MB; Collier JP; Van Citters DW; Kennedy FE
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):431-40. PubMed ID: 18358384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical results of primary low contact stress cementless total knee arthroplasty.
    Sorrells RB; Capps SG
    Orthopedics; 2006 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):S42-4. PubMed ID: 17002147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The history of mobile-bearing total knee replacement systems.
    Hamelynck KJ
    Orthopedics; 2006 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):S7-12. PubMed ID: 17002140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of biomechanical effect of stem-end design in revision TKA using Digital Korean model.
    Kim YH; Kwon OS; Kim K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Aug; 23(7):853-8. PubMed ID: 18321621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mobile-bearing knees reduce rotational asymmetric wear.
    Ho FY; Ma HM; Liau JJ; Yeh CR; Huang CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 462():143-9. PubMed ID: 17483732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and radiological outcomes after revision to the low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Whitehead DJ; Hooper GJ; Bell V
    ANZ J Surg; 2009 May; 79(5):348-51. PubMed ID: 19566515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contact stress analysis of the conforming post-cam mechanism in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
    Akasaki Y; Matsuda S; Shimoto T; Miura H; Higaki H; Iwamoto Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):736-43. PubMed ID: 18655950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of the effect of conformity of knee hemiarthroplasty designs on contact stress, friction and degeneration of articular cartilage: a tribological study.
    McCann L; Ingham E; Jin Z; Fisher J
    J Biomech; 2009 Jun; 42(9):1326-31. PubMed ID: 19380137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo contact stresses during activities of daily living after knee arthroplasty.
    D'Lima DD; Steklov N; Fregly BJ; Banks SA; Colwell CW
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1549-55. PubMed ID: 18524001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Management of the severe varus and valgus knee using the low contact stress rotating platform.
    Beverland D
    Orthopedics; 2006 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):S60-3. PubMed ID: 17002152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of survivorship and contact stress analyses to predict the long-term efficacy of new generation joint replacement designs. A model for FDA device evaluation.
    Buechel FF; Pappas MJ; Greenwald AS
    Orthop Rev; 1991 Jan; 20(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 1997955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear of contemporary total knee replacements--a knee simulator study of six current designs.
    Utzschneider S; Harrasser N; Schroeder C; Mazoochian F; Jansson V
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):583-8. PubMed ID: 19450910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The P.F.C. sigma RP-F total knee arthroplasty: designed for improved performance.
    Ranawat AS; Gupta SK; Ranawat CS
    Orthopedics; 2006 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):S28-9. PubMed ID: 17002144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.