These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17002943)

  • 21. Speciation is not necessarily easier in species with sexually monomorphic mating signals.
    Noh S; Henry CS
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Nov; 28(11):1925-39. PubMed ID: 26230311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The evolution of male and female mating preferences in Drosophila speciation.
    Yukilevich R; Peterson EK
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1759-1773. PubMed ID: 31077339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Social Plasticity Enhances Signal-Preference Codivergence.
    Desjonquères C; Speck B; Seidita S; Cirino LA; Escalante I; Sergi C; Maliszewski J; Wiese C; Hoebel G; Bailey NW; Rodríguez RL
    Am Nat; 2023 Dec; 202(6):818-829. PubMed ID: 38033176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Phenotypic differentiation and pre-mating isolation between allopatric populations of Girardinichthys multiradiatus.
    González Zuarth C; Macías Garcia C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 273(1584):301-7. PubMed ID: 16543172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rapid diversification of sexual signals in Hawaiian Nesosydne planthoppers (Hemiptera: Delphacidae): the relative role of neutral and selective forces.
    Goodman KR; Kelley JP; Welter SC; Roderick GK; Elias DO
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Feb; 28(2):415-27. PubMed ID: 25535672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Coevolution of male and female mate choice can destabilize reproductive isolation.
    Aubier TG; Kokko H; Joron M
    Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):5122. PubMed ID: 31719522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Combinatorial Signal Processing in an Insect.
    Speck B; Seidita S; Belo S; Johnson S; Conley C; Desjonquères C; Rodríguez RL
    Am Nat; 2020 Oct; 196(4):406-413. PubMed ID: 32970471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Trees to treehoppers: genetic variation in host plants contributes to variation in the mating signals of a plant-feeding insect.
    Rebar D; Rodríguez RL
    Ecol Lett; 2014 Feb; 17(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 24350855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Female preference functions drive interpopulation divergence in male signalling: call diversity in the bushcricket Ephippiger diurnus.
    Barbosa F; Rebar D; Greenfield MD
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2219-2228. PubMed ID: 27471011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of multiple cues in mate choice.
    Candolin U
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2003 Nov; 78(4):575-95. PubMed ID: 14700392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preference in Hawaiian crickets.
    Shaw KL
    Evolution; 2000 Aug; 54(4):1303-12. PubMed ID: 11005297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genotype × environment interaction is weaker in genitalia than in mating signals and body traits in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Rodríguez RL; Al-Wathiqui N
    Genetica; 2011 Jul; 139(7):871-84. PubMed ID: 21695477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mate choice in adult female Bengalese finches: females express consistent preferences for individual males and prefer female-directed song performances.
    Dunning JL; Pant S; Bass A; Coburn Z; Prather JF
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89438. PubMed ID: 24558501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Divergence of a speciation trait through artificial selection: Insights into constraints, by-product effects and sexual isolation.
    Yukilevich R; LaGraff JT
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Feb; 36(2):355-367. PubMed ID: 36576691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evolution of choosiness dictates whether search costs of mate choice enhance speciation by sexual selection.
    Yukilevich R; Aoki F
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Aug; 35(8):1045-1059. PubMed ID: 35830473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Veiled preferences and cryptic female choice could underlie the origin of novel sexual traits.
    Moehring AJ; Boughman JW
    Biol Lett; 2019 Feb; 15(2):20180878. PubMed ID: 30958124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of ecology in speciation by sexual selection: a systematic empirical review.
    Scordato ES; Symes LB; Mendelson TC; Safran RJ
    J Hered; 2014; 105 Suppl 1():782-94. PubMed ID: 25149254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.