These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17002943)

  • 41. The role of ecology in speciation by sexual selection: a systematic empirical review.
    Scordato ES; Symes LB; Mendelson TC; Safran RJ
    J Hered; 2014; 105 Suppl 1():782-94. PubMed ID: 25149254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Within-population variation in female mating preference affects the opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of male traits, but things are not as simple as expected.
    Millan CH; Machado G; Muniz DG
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Nov; 33(11):1579-1592. PubMed ID: 32871625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Poison frog color morphs express assortative mate preferences in allopatry but not sympatry.
    Yang Y; Richards-Zawacki CL; Devar A; Dugas MB
    Evolution; 2016 Dec; 70(12):2778-2788. PubMed ID: 27704539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The ecological stage changes benefits of mate choice and drives preference divergence.
    Tinghitella RM; Lackey ACR; Durso C; Koop JAH; Boughman JW
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Aug; 375(1806):20190546. PubMed ID: 32654644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks.
    Head ML; Kozak GM; Boughman JW
    Ecol Evol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):2183-96. PubMed ID: 23919161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effects of sexual selection on trait divergence in a peripheral population with gene flow.
    Servedio MR; Bürger R
    Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2648-61. PubMed ID: 26332694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. On the architecture of mate choice decisions: preference functions and choosiness are distinct traits.
    Neelon DP; Rodríguez RL; Höbel G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 286(1897):20182830. PubMed ID: 30963823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evolution of novel signal traits in the absence of female preferences in Neoconocephalus katydids (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae).
    Bush SL; Schul J
    PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e12457. PubMed ID: 20805980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Adaptive, but not condition-dependent, body shape differences contribute to assortative mating preferences during ecological speciation.
    Greenway R; Drexler S; Arias-Rodriguez L; Tobler M
    Evolution; 2016 Dec; 70(12):2809-2822. PubMed ID: 27718237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A role for learning in population divergence of mate preferences.
    Svensson EI; Eroukhmanoff F; Karlsson K; Runemark A; Brodin A
    Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3101-13. PubMed ID: 20629727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evolution of divergent female mating preference in response to experimental sexual selection.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    Evolution; 2014 Sep; 68(9):2524-33. PubMed ID: 24931497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Character displacement and the evolution of mate choice: an artificial neural network approach.
    Pfennig KS; Ryan MJ
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 362(1479):411-9. PubMed ID: 17255015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Aesthetic evolution by mate choice: Darwin's really dangerous idea.
    Prum RO
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Aug; 367(1600):2253-65. PubMed ID: 22777014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Flexible mate choice may contribute to ecotype assortative mating in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus).
    Jarvis WMC; Comeau SM; Colborne SF; Robinson BW
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Oct; 30(10):1810-1820. PubMed ID: 28590579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Variable female preferences drive complex male displays.
    Coleman SW; Patricelli GL; Borgia G
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):742-5. PubMed ID: 15085130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Testing the correlated response hypothesis for the evolution and maintenance of male mating preferences in Drosophila serrata.
    Gosden TP; Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct; 27(10):2106-12. PubMed ID: 25078542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The role of mating preferences in shaping interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates.
    Ptacek MB
    Behav Processes; 2000 Oct; 51(1-3):111-134. PubMed ID: 11074316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Contemporary sexual selection does not explain variation in male display traits among populations.
    Watts JC; Flynn A; Tenhumberg B; Hebets EA
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1927-1940. PubMed ID: 31343745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Axes of multivariate sexual signal divergence among incipient species: Concordance with selection, genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity.
    Oh KP; Shaw KL
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Jan; 35(1):109-123. PubMed ID: 34668602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Blows MW
    PLoS Biol; 2005 Nov; 3(11):e368. PubMed ID: 16231971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.