These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1700392)

  • 1. Electrophysiological effects of monophasic and biphasic stimuli in normal and infarcted dogs.
    Wharton JM; Richard VJ; Murry CE; Dixon EG; Reimer KA; Meador J; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Sep; 13(9):1158-72. PubMed ID: 1700392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of transvenous electrode polarity and waveform duration on the relationship between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1351-9. PubMed ID: 9286969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold.
    Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9309741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of shock waveform on relationship between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold.
    Swerdlow CD; Kass RM; O'Connor ME; Chen PS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 9(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 9581950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of electrode polarity on internal defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic waveforms using an endocardial lead system.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Walker RG; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9048247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choosing the optimal monophasic and biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation.
    Walcott GP; Walker RG; Cates AW; Krassowska W; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Sep; 6(9):737-50. PubMed ID: 8556194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the second phase of a biphasic defibrillation waveform the defibrillating phase?
    Hillsley RE; Walker RG; Swanson DK; Rollins DL; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jul; 16(7 Pt 1):1401-11. PubMed ID: 7689206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The zone of vulnerability to T wave shocks in humans.
    Swerdlow CD; Martin DJ; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Gang ES; Chen PS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 9147699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.
    Birgersdotter-Green U; Undesser K; Fujimura O; Feld GK; Kass RM; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 10387143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of rapid pacing and T-wave scanning on the relation between the defibrillation and upper-limit-of-vulnerability dose-response curves.
    Malkin RA; Idriss SF; Walker RG; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 7648678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms.
    Dixon EG; Tang AS; Wolf PD; Meador JT; Fine MJ; Calfee RV; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1987 Nov; 76(5):1176-84. PubMed ID: 3665001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: the importance of phasic duration.
    Tang AS; Yabe S; Wharton JM; Dolker M; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Jan; 13(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 2909569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation probability of success curves using a nonthoracotomy lead system.
    Souza JJ; Malkin RA; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1247-52. PubMed ID: 7850965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increasing fibrillation duration enhances relative asymmetrical biphasic versus monophasic defibrillator waveform efficacy.
    Jones JL; Swartz JF; Jones RE; Fletcher R
    Circ Res; 1990 Aug; 67(2):376-84. PubMed ID: 2376078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epicardial mapping of ventricular defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs.
    Zhou X; Daubert JP; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1993 Jan; 72(1):145-60. PubMed ID: 8417837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.
    Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep.
    Cooper RA; Alferness CA; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1993 May; 87(5):1673-86. PubMed ID: 8491023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system.
    Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relation of atrial refractoriness to upper and lower limits of vulnerability for atrial fibrillation/flutter following implantable ventricular defibrillator shocks.
    Katz A; Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR; Prystowsky EN
    Circulation; 1999 Sep; 100(10):1125-30. PubMed ID: 10477539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation: optimization of total pulse and second phase durations.
    Matula MH; Brooks MJ; Pan Q; Pless BD; Province RA; Echt DS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2154-62. PubMed ID: 9309738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.