These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Optimal two-stage genotyping designs for genome-wide association scans. Wang H; Thomas DC; Pe'er I; Stram DO Genet Epidemiol; 2006 May; 30(4):356-68. PubMed ID: 16607626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optimal two-stage design for case-control association analysis incorporating genotyping errors. Zuo Y; Zou G; Wang J; Zhao H; Liang H Ann Hum Genet; 2008 May; 72(Pt 3):375-87. PubMed ID: 18215207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [A review of power and sample size estimation in genomewide association studies]. Park AK; Kim H J Prev Med Public Health; 2007 Mar; 40(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 17426422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Two-stage designs for experiments with a large number of hypotheses. Zehetmayer S; Bauer P; Posch M Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(19):3771-7. PubMed ID: 16091414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Adaptive two-stage analysis of genetic association in case-control designs. Zheng G; Song K; Elston RC Hum Hered; 2007; 63(3-4):175-86. PubMed ID: 17310127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Two-Stage sampling designs for gene association studies. Thomas D; Xie R; Gebregziabher M Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):401-14. PubMed ID: 15543639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Stepwise two-stage sample size adaptation. Wan H; Ellenberg SS; Anderson KM Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 25252082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimal multistage designs--a general framework for efficient genome-wide association studies. Pahl R; Schäfer H; Müller HH Biostatistics; 2009 Apr; 10(2):297-309. PubMed ID: 19075295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Screening and replication using the same data set: testing strategies for family-based studies in which all probands are affected. Murphy A; Weiss ST; Lange C PLoS Genet; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000197. PubMed ID: 18802462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Research Techniques Made Simple: Sample Size Estimation and Power Calculation. Schmidt SAJ; Lo S; Hollestein LM J Invest Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 138(8):1678-1682. PubMed ID: 30032783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluating strategies for marker ranking in genome-wide association studies of complex traits. Scherag A; Hebebrand J; Wichmann HE; Jöckel KH Methods Inf Med; 2010; 49(6):632-40. PubMed ID: 20686736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sample-size properties of a case-control association analysis of multistage SNP studies for identifying disease susceptibility genes. Kitamura N; Akazawa K; Toyabe SI; Miyashita A; Kuwano R; Nakamura J J Hum Genet; 2008; 53(5):390-400. PubMed ID: 18288444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sample size calculations for population- and family-based case-control association studies on marker genotypes. Pfeiffer RM; Gail MH Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Sep; 25(2):136-48. PubMed ID: 12916022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multistage sampling for genetic studies. Elston RC; Lin D; Zheng G Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2007; 8():327-42. PubMed ID: 17506660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Genome-wide association study on complex diseases: genetic statistical issues]. Yan WL Yi Chuan; 2008 May; 30(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 18487142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Genetic dissection methods: designs used for tests of gene-environment interaction. Liu X; Fallin MD; Kao WH Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2004 Jun; 14(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 15172665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of error rates in single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials. Tang H; Foster NR; Grothey A; Ansell SM; Goldberg RM; Sargent DJ J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 28(11):1936-41. PubMed ID: 20212253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]