BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17004071)

  • 1. [Experiments on prosody perception with cochlear implants].
    Meister H; Tepeli D; Wagner P; Hess W; Walger M; von Wedel H; Lang-Roth R
    HNO; 2007 Apr; 55(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 17004071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Conception and realisation of a prosody test battery].
    Meister H; Pyschny V; Landwehr M; Wagner P; Walger M; von Wedel H
    HNO; 2008 Mar; 56(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 17579822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of vowel length, word stress, and compound words and phrases by postlingually deafened cochlear implant listeners.
    Morris D; Magnusson L; Faulkner A; Jönsson R; Juul H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):879-90. PubMed ID: 24224994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prosody perception and musical pitch discrimination in adults using cochlear implants.
    Kalathottukaren RT; Purdy SC; Ballard E
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54(7):444-52. PubMed ID: 25634773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosody Perception and Production in Children with Hearing Loss and Age- and Gender-Matched Controls.
    Kalathottukaren RT; Purdy SC; Ballard E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):283-294. PubMed ID: 28418324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The perception of stress and intonation in children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Hegarty L; Faulkner A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14 Suppl 4():S35-9. PubMed ID: 24533762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech prosody perception in cochlear implant users with and without residual hearing.
    Marx M; James C; Foxton J; Capber A; Fraysse B; Barone P; Deguine O
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):239-48. PubMed ID: 25303861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural correlates of prosodic boundary perception in German preschoolers: If pause is present, pitch can go.
    Männel C; Friederici AD
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1632():27-33. PubMed ID: 26683081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The perception of prosody and associated auditory cues in early-implanted children: the role of auditory working memory and musical activities.
    Torppa R; Faulkner A; Huotilainen M; Järvikivi J; Lipsanen J; Laasonen M; Vainio M
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 24460045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory Discrimination of Lexical Stress Patterns in Hearing-Impaired Infants with Cochlear Implants Compared with Normal Hearing: Influence of Acoustic Cues and Listening Experience to the Ambient Language.
    Segal O; Houston D; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 26627470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advantage of bimodal fitting in prosody perception for children using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Straatman LV; Rietveld AC; Beijen J; Mylanus EA; Mens LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1884-95. PubMed ID: 20968360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sad and happy emotion discrimination in music by children with cochlear implants.
    Hopyan T; Manno FA; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Child Neuropsychol; 2016; 22(3):366-80. PubMed ID: 25562621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using prosody to infer discourse prominence in cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Huang YT; Newman RS; Catalano A; Goupell MJ
    Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():184-200. PubMed ID: 28578222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrimination of prosody and music by normal children.
    Doherty CP; Fitzsimons M; Asenbauer B; Staunton H
    Eur J Neurol; 1999 Mar; 6(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 10053235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of the A§E test battery for assessment of pitch perception in speech.
    Heeren W; Coene M; Vaerenberg B; Avram A; Cardinaletti A; del Bo L; Pascu A; Volpato F; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Nov; 13(4):206-19. PubMed ID: 22449360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of electric hearing on children's timbre and pitch perception and talker discrimination.
    Sjoberg KM; Driscoll VD; Gfeller K; Welhaven AE; Kirk KI; Prusick L
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Jan; 18(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 28098512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.