BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17004259)

  • 1. 12-month follow-up analysis of a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial in de novo liver transplant recipients (LIS2T) comparing cyclosporine microemulsion (C2 monitoring) and tacrolimus.
    Levy G; Grazi GL; Sanjuan F; Wu Y; Mühlbacher F; Samuel D; Friman S; Jones R; Cantisani G; Villamil F; Cillo U; Clavien PA; Klintmalm G; Otto G; Pollard S; McCormick PA
    Liver Transpl; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1464-72. PubMed ID: 17004259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus in 39 recipients of living donor liver transplantation.
    Tanaka K; Lake J; Villamil F; Levy G; Marotta P; Mies S; de Hemptinne B; Moench C
    Liver Transpl; 2005 Nov; 11(11):1395-402. PubMed ID: 16237691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin A microemulsion in renal transplantation: 2 year follow-up results.
    Krämer BK; Montagnino G; Del Castillo D; Margreiter R; Sperschneider H; Olbricht CJ; Krüger B; Ortuño J; Köhler H; Kunzendorf U; Stummvoll HK; Tabernero JM; Mühlbacher F; Rivero M; Arias M;
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 May; 20(5):968-73. PubMed ID: 15741208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microemulsion cyclosporine with C2 monitoring and tacrolimus in liver transplantation with or without hepatitis C virus infection.
    Jain A
    Liver Transpl; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1452-4. PubMed ID: 17004248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Results of lis2t, a multicenter, randomized study comparing cyclosporine microemulsion with C2 monitoring and tacrolimus with C0 monitoring in de novo liver transplantation.
    Levy G; Villamil F; Samuel D; Sanjuan F; Grazi GL; Wu Y; Marotta P; Boillot O; Muehlbacher F; Klintmalm G;
    Transplantation; 2004 Jun; 77(11):1632-8. PubMed ID: 15201658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of neoral 2-hour postdose concentration monitoring versus tacrolimus trough concentration monitoring in de novo liver transplant recipients.
    Shenoy S; Hardinger KL; Crippin J; Korenblat K; Lisker-Melman M; Lowell JA; Chapman W
    Liver Transpl; 2008 Feb; 14(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 18236391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical outcomes during the first three months posttransplant in renal allograft recipients managed by C2 monitoring of cyclosporine microemulsion.
    Thervet E; Pfeffer P; Scolari MP; Toselli L; Pallardó LM; Chadban S; Pilmore H; Connolly J; Buchler M; Schena FP; Carreño CA; Dandavino R; Cole E
    Transplantation; 2003 Sep; 76(6):903-8. PubMed ID: 14508352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of immediate switch from cyclosporine microemulsion to tacrolimus at first acute rejection in renal allograft recipients.
    Briggs D; Dudley C; Pattison J; Pfeffer P; Salmela K; Rowe P; Tydén G;
    Transplantation; 2003 Jun; 75(12):2058-63. PubMed ID: 12829912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation: the Canadian tacrolimus versus microemulsion cyclosporin A trial: 1-year follow-up.
    Greig P; Lilly L; Scudamore C; Erb S; Yoshida E; Kneteman N; Bain V; Ghent C; Marotta P; Grant D; Wall W; Tchervenkov J; Barkun J; Roy A; Marleau D; McAlister V; Peltekian K
    Liver Transpl; 2003 Jun; 9(6):587-95. PubMed ID: 12783400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five-year results of a randomized, single-center study of tacrolimus vs microemulsion cyclosporine in heart transplant patients.
    Kobashigawa JA; Patel J; Furukawa H; Moriguchi JD; Yeatman L; Takemoto S; Marquez A; Shaw J; Oeser BT; Subherwal S; Wu GW; Kawano J; Laks H
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 Apr; 25(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 16563974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with ciclosporin A in renal transplantation: three-year observational results.
    Krämer BK; Del Castillo D; Margreiter R; Sperschneider H; Olbricht CJ; Ortuño J; Sester U; Kunzendorf U; Dietl KH; Bonomini V; Rigotti P; Ronco C; Tabernero JM; Rivero M; Banas B; Mühlbacher F; Arias M; Montagnino G;
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2008 Jul; 23(7):2386-92. PubMed ID: 18258740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Paired kidney analysis of tacrolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion-based therapy in Chinese cadaveric renal transplant recipients.
    Cheung CY; Wong KM; Chan HW; Liu YL; Chan YH; Wong HS; Chak WL; Choi KS; Chau KF; Li CS
    Transpl Int; 2006 Aug; 19(8):657-66. PubMed ID: 16827683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of the absorption profile of cyclosporine A in renal transplant recipients: a longitudinal study of the de novo and maintenance phases.
    Büchler M; Chadban S; Cole E; Midtvedt K; Thervet E; Prestele H; Keown P
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Jan; 21(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 16204301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of late conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring of microemulsified cyclosporine in pediatric living donor liver transplant recipients.
    Takatsuki M; Chen CL; Chen YS; Wang CC; Lin CC; Yang CH; Yong CC; Liu YW
    Clin Transplant; 2004 Dec; 18(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 15516246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of generic cyclosporine microemulsion versus neoral in de novo renal transplant recipients managed by 2-hour postdose monitoring.
    Sharma A; Shekhar C; Heer M; Minz M
    Transplant Proc; 2006 Sep; 38(7):2051-3. PubMed ID: 16979996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing tacrolimus therapy in the maintenance of renal allografts: 12-month results.
    Bolin P; Shihab FS; Mulloy L; Henning AK; Gao J; Bartucci M; Holman J; First MR;
    Transplantation; 2008 Jul; 86(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 18622283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-year posttransplant graft survival in renal-transplant patients with graft function at 6 months receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine microemulsion within a triple-drug regimen.
    Irish W; Sherrill B; Brennan DC; Lowell J; Schnitzler M
    Transplantation; 2003 Dec; 76(12):1686-90. PubMed ID: 14688516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rationale and design of the DIRECT study: a comparative assessment of the hyperglycemic effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine following renal transplantation.
    Vincenti F; Rostaing L;
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Feb; 26(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15837449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early cyclosporine C0 and C2 monitoring in de novo kidney transplant patients: a prospective randomized single-center pilot study.
    Kyllönen LE; Salmela KT
    Transplantation; 2006 Apr; 81(7):1010-5. PubMed ID: 16612277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cyclosporine profiling with C2 and C0 monitoring improves outcomes after heart transplantation.
    Barnard JB; Thekkudan J; Richardson S; Bittar MN; Martyszczuck R; Hasan J; Khasati N; Keevil B; Yonan N
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 May; 25(5):564-8. PubMed ID: 16678036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 72.