These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17004482)

  • 1. Voiceless affricate/fricative distinction by frication duration and amplitude rise slope.
    Mitani S; Kitama T; Sato Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Sep; 120(3):1600-7. PubMed ID: 17004482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of acoustic cues on labeling fricatives and affricates.
    Hedrick M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 40(4):925-38. PubMed ID: 9263955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Amplitude rise time and the perception of the voiceless affricate/fricative distinction.
    Kluender KR; Walsh MA
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Apr; 51(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 1603646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Duration of frication noise required for identification of English fricatives.
    Jongman A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1718-25. PubMed ID: 2708688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of relative amplitude of frication on perception of place of articulation.
    Hedrick MS; Ohde RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2005-26. PubMed ID: 8227744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Labeling of /s/ and [see text] by listeners with normal and impaired hearing, revisited.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Jun; 46(3):636-48. PubMed ID: 14696991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of vowel duration as a cue for the voicing distinction in the following word-final consonant.
    Hogan JT; Rozsypal AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1764-71. PubMed ID: 7372932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.
    Jongman A; Wayland R; Wong S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1252-63. PubMed ID: 11008825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of several acoustic cues on perceiving Mandarin retroflex affricates and fricatives in continuous speech.
    Zhu J; Chen Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):461. PubMed ID: 27475170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A psychoacoustic method for studying the necessary and sufficient perceptual cues of American English fricative consonants in noise.
    Li F; Trevino A; Menon A; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2663-75. PubMed ID: 23039459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual integration of acoustic cues to laryngeal contrasts in Korean fricatives.
    Lee S; Katz J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):605-11. PubMed ID: 26936544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listeners can anticipate future segments before they identify the current one.
    Schreiber KE; McMurray B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1147-1166. PubMed ID: 31087271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception in rats: use of duration and rise time cues in labeling of affricate/fricative sounds.
    Reed P; Howell P; Sackin S; Pizzimenti L; Rosen S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Sep; 80(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 14674729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic analysis and perception of Spanish fricative consonants.
    de Manrique AM; Massone MI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Apr; 69(4):1145-53. PubMed ID: 7229202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition of vowels from information in fricatives: perceptual evidence of fricative-vowel coarticulation.
    Yeni-Komshian GH; Soli SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Oct; 70(4):966-75. PubMed ID: 7288043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception.
    Mann VA; Repp BH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Feb; 69(2):548-58. PubMed ID: 7462477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Listener expectations and gender bias in nonsibilant fricative perception.
    Babel M; McGuire G
    Phonetica; 2013; 70(1-2):117-51. PubMed ID: 24157437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the role of the amplitude of the fricative noise in the perception of place of articulation in voiceless fricative consonants.
    Behrens S; Blumstein SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):861-7. PubMed ID: 3183204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Language specificity in the perception of voiceless sibilant fricatives in Japanese and English: implications for cross-language differences in speech-sound development.
    Li F; Munson B; Edwards J; Yoneyama K; Hall K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):999-1011. PubMed ID: 21361456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alveolar and Postalveolar Voiceless Fricative and Affricate Productions of Spanish-English Bilingual Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Li F; Bunta F; Tomblin JB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 60(9):2427-2441. PubMed ID: 28800372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.