289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17004564)
1. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial.
Moncada GC; Martin J; Fernandez E; Vildosola PG; Caamano C; Caro MJ; Mjor IA; Gordan VV
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(5):314-8. PubMed ID: 17004564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial.
Moncada G; Fernández E; Martín J; Arancibia C; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 18505215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations.
Gordan VV; Shen C; Riley J; Mjör IA
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(3):144-53; discussion 154. PubMed ID: 16831187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants.
Martin J; Fernandez E; Estay J; Gordan VV; Mjor IA; Moncada G
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 22788726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations.
Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mjör IA
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 16924981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sealed restorations: 5-year results.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Richards EE; Williams JE; Smith CD; Mackert JR; Schuster GS; Sherrer JD; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Wenner KK
Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 1524744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effectiveness of preventive resin restorations in pediatric patients.
Walker J; Floyd K; Jakobsen J; Pinkham JR
ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):338-40. PubMed ID: 8958345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: six-year results.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Smith CD; Williams JE; Sherrer JD; Mackert JR; Richards EE; Schuster GS; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Kovarik RE
Quintessence Int; 1992 Dec; 23(12):827-38. PubMed ID: 1305301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland.
Mjör IA; Shen C; Eliasson ST; Richter S
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 11931133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sealed restorations: 4-year results.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Williams JE; Pierce KL; Smith CD; Schuster GS; Mackert JR; Sherrer JD; Wenner KK; Richards EE; Davis QB
Am J Dent; 1991 Feb; 4(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 2003895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A retrospective cohort evaluation of preventive resin restorations.
Roth AG; Conry JP
J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Mar; 58(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 1555126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: nine-year results among children and adults.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Adair SM; Sams DR; Curtis JW; Ergle JW; Hawkins KI; Mackert JR; O'Dell NL; Richards EE; Rueggeberg F
ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 7608378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years.
Krämer N; Reinelt C; Richter G; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 19237189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-year clinical evaluation of preventive resin restorations.
Moore DS; Gilpatrick RO; Cloyd JS
J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1994 Apr; 74(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 9520767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S
Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of fissure caries in the community dental services using sealant restorations: a field trial.
Gray GB; Paterson RC
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Mar; 6(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 9680884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations - a 10-year report.
Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R; Gaebler P
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 15387840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study.
Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mondragon E; Garvan CW; Mjör IA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jul; 142(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 21719808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up.
Fernández EM; Martin JA; Angel PA; Mjör IA; Gordan VV; Moncada GA
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 21537587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
