289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17004564)
21. Effect of Refurbishing Amalgam and Resin Composite Restorations After 12 Years: Controlled Clinical Trial.
Estay J; Martín J; Vildosola P; Mjor IA; Oliveira OB; Andrade MF; Moncada G; Gordan VV; Fernández E
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(6):587-595. PubMed ID: 28857709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The preventive resin restoration: a conservative alternative.
McConnachie I
J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Mar; 58(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 1555123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Repair or replacement of restorations: do we accept built in obsolescence or do we improve the evidence?
Sharif MO; Fedorowicz Z; Tickle M; Brunton PA
Br Dent J; 2010 Aug; 209(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 20798721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sealants: where we have been; where we are going.
Donly KJ
Gen Dent; 2002; 50(5):438-40. PubMed ID: 12448896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bonded amalgam sealants and adhesive resin sealants: five-year clinical results.
Staninec M; Artiga N; Gansky SA; Marshall GW; Eakle S
Quintessence Int; 2004 May; 35(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 15130073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Composite or amalgam? Not a black or white decision].
Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Burgersdijk RC
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Oct; 99(10):371-4. PubMed ID: 11820006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A 3-year clinical study of a hybrid composite resin as fissure sealant and as restorative material for Class I restorations.
Städtler P
Quintessence Int; 1992 Nov; 23(11):759-62. PubMed ID: 1305291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Repairing the ditched amalgam.
Anderson MH
J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1993; 72(5):19-21. PubMed ID: 8040717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical performance of sealed composite restorations placed over caries compared with sealed and unsealed amalgam restorations.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Call-Smith KM; Shuster GS; Williams JE; Davis QB; Smith CD; Bell RA; Sherrer JD; Myers DR; Morse PK
J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Nov; 115(5):689-94. PubMed ID: 3479490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations.
Cardoso M; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 10635277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Preventive resin restorations: an alternative approach.
Stanley RT
Ohio Dent J; 1984 Jan; 58(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 6584807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Amalgam--Resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam.
Wahl MJ
Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):525-35. PubMed ID: 11495565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial.
Moncada G; Martin J; Fernández E; Hempel MC; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Apr; 140(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 19339531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A 12-month clinical trial examining the effects of a surface sealant on Class I composite resin restorations.
Nahsan F; Wang L; Modena K; Francisconi-dos-Rios L; da Silva L; Calabria M; Casas-Apayco L; Mondelli RF
Gen Dent; 2016; 64(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 26943083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in Class III cavities: 5-year results.
Demirci M; Ersev H; Sancakli HS; Topçubaşi M
Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 17073207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
Pollington S; van Noort R
Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Defective direct composite restorations--replace or repair? A survey of teaching in Scandinavian dental schools.
Blum IR; Mjör IA; Schriever A; Heidemann D; Wilson NH
Swed Dent J; 2003; 27(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 14608966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Placement and replacement of dental restorations.
Mahmood S; Chohan AN; Al-Jannakh M; Al-Baker H; Smales RJ
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2004 Oct; 14(10):589-92. PubMed ID: 15456546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
