These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17004878)

  • 1. Effect of visual feedback on surgical performance using the da Vinci surgical system.
    Oleynikov D; Solomon B; Hallbeck S
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2006 Oct; 16(5):503-8. PubMed ID: 17004878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System.
    Byrn JC; Schluender S; Divino CM; Conrad J; Gurland B; Shlasko E; Szold A
    Am J Surg; 2007 Apr; 193(4):519-22. PubMed ID: 17368303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which skills really matter? proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator.
    Lyons C; Goldfarb D; Jones SL; Badhiwala N; Miles B; Link R; Dunkin BJ
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):2020-30. PubMed ID: 23389060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance.
    Reiley CE; Akinbiyi T; Burschka D; Chang DC; Okamura AM; Yuh DD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 135(1):196-202. PubMed ID: 18179942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel drill set for the enhancement and assessment of robotic surgical performance.
    Ro CY; Toumpoulis IK; Ashton RC; Imielinska C; Jebara T; Shin SH; Zipkin JD; McGinty JJ; Todd GJ; Derose JJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():418-21. PubMed ID: 15718771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
    Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
    Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool.
    Ramos P; Montez J; Tripp A; Ng CK; Gill IS; Hung AJ
    BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 24224500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills.
    Sarle R; Tewari A; Shrivastava A; Peabody J; Menon M
    J Endourol; 2004 Feb; 18(1):63-6; discussion 66-7. PubMed ID: 15006057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective assessment of proficiency with bimanual inanimate tasks in robotic laparoscopy.
    Narazaki K; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2007 Feb; 17(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17362179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mentoring console improves collaboration and teaching in surgical robotics.
    Hanly EJ; Miller BE; Kumar R; Hasser CJ; Coste-Maniere E; Talamini MA; Aurora AA; Schenkman NS; Marohn MR
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2006 Oct; 16(5):445-51. PubMed ID: 17004866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurements of the level of surgical expertise using flight path analysis from da Vinci robotic surgical system.
    Verner L; Oleynikov D; Holtmann S; Haider H; Zhukov L
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 94():373-8. PubMed ID: 15455928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Video-based peer feedback through social networking for robotic surgery simulation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Carter SC; Chiang A; Shah G; Kwan L; Montgomery JS; Karam A; Tarnay C; Guru KA; Hu JC
    Ann Surg; 2015 May; 261(5):870-5. PubMed ID: 24887970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.
    Hung AJ; Jayaratna IS; Teruya K; Desai MM; Gill IS; Goh AC
    BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):864-71. PubMed ID: 23470136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of robotic manipulators on movements of novices and surgeons.
    Nisky I; Okamura AM; Hsieh MH
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Jul; 28(7):2145-58. PubMed ID: 24519031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual-perceptual mismatch in robotic surgery.
    Abiri A; Tao A; LaRocca M; Guan X; Askari SJ; Bisley JW; Dutson EP; Grundfest WS
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3271-3278. PubMed ID: 27924387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Establishing a training program for residents in robotic surgery.
    Moles JJ; Connelly PE; Sarti EE; Baredes S
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Oct; 119(10):1927-31. PubMed ID: 19655337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator.
    Hung AJ; Zehnder P; Patil MB; Cai J; Ng CK; Aron M; Gill IS; Desai MM
    J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):1019-24. PubMed ID: 21784469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the da Vinci si single console and dual console in teaching novice surgeons suturing techniques.
    Crusco S; Jackson T; Advincula A
    JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks.
    Judkins TN; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Mar; 23(3):590-7. PubMed ID: 18443870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The da Vinci(®) Surgical System overcomes innate hand dominance.
    Mucksavage P; Kerbl DC; Lee JY
    J Endourol; 2011 Aug; 25(8):1385-8. PubMed ID: 21815795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.