BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17005324)

  • 41. [Biomedical information on the internet using search engines. A one-year trial].
    Corrao S; Leone F; Arnone S
    Recenti Prog Med; 2004 Jan; 95(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 15032337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Obtaining good quality medical information from the World Wide Web.
    Thom DH; Polosa R
    Ann Ital Med Int; 2002; 17(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11975112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessing the content and quality of information on the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis on the World Wide Web.
    Pérez-López FR; Pérez Roncero GR
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2006 Dec; 22(12):669-75. PubMed ID: 17162708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Strategies for health information retrieval.
    Soualmia LF; Dahamna B; Thirion B; Darmoni SJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():595-600. PubMed ID: 17108582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Can we trust cancer information on the Internet?--A comparison of interactive cancer risk sites.
    Ekman A; Hall P; Litton JE
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Aug; 16(6):765-72. PubMed ID: 16049816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessing the quality of websites providing information on multiple sclerosis: evaluating tools and comparing sites.
    Harland J; Bath P
    Health Informatics J; 2007 Sep; 13(3):207-21. PubMed ID: 17711882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. How to evaluate the quality of health related websites.
    Gattoni F; Sicola C
    Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 15775897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An analysis of cluster headache information provided on internet websites.
    Peterlin BL; Gambini-Suarez E; Lidicker J; Levin M
    Headache; 2008 Mar; 48(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 18005143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A study of undue pain and surfing: using hierarchical criteria to assess website quality.
    Lorence D; Abraham J
    Health Informatics J; 2008 Sep; 14(3):155-73. PubMed ID: 18775823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Internet and the diabetic foot: quality of online information in French language.
    Richard JL; Schuldiner S; Jourdan N; Daurès JP; Vannerau D; Rodier M; Lavit P
    Diabetes Metab; 2007 Jun; 33(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 17347012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Bipolar disorder and manic-depressive disorder on the Internet].
    Seyringer ME; Schrank B; Berger P; Katschnig H; Amering M
    Neuropsychiatr; 2007; 21(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 17640501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A first look at HealthCyberMap medical semantic subject search engine.
    Boulos MN
    Technol Health Care; 2004; 12(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 15096685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quality evaluation of orthodontic information on the World Wide Web.
    Jiang YL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 10893465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Brief-DISCERN, a possible way to improve patient's search on the health-related web].
    Khazaal Y; Chatton A; Coquard O; Zullino D
    Rev Med Suisse; 2009 Sep; 5(217):1816-9. PubMed ID: 19839369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Health care providers on the World Wide Web: quality of presentations of surgical departments in Germany.
    Stausberg J; Fuchs J; Hüsing J; Hirche H
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2001; 26(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11583405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Myelomeningocele information on the internet is accessible and of variable quality, and requires a high reading level.
    Bergman J; Konijeti R; Lerman SE
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1138-42. PubMed ID: 17296433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Formal quality criteria for websites do not guarantee complete health information of good quality: we need more attention to information on prognosis.
    Norg RJ; El Bakkali N; Portegijs PJ; Knottnerus JA; van Schayck CP
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2007; 13(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 17853176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Characterisation and evaluation of UK websites on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Akram G; Thomson AH; Boyter AC; Morton MJ
    Arch Dis Child; 2008 Aug; 93(8):695-700. PubMed ID: 18337283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. How to measure the quality of surgery-related web sites.
    Yermilov I; Chow W; Devgan L; Makary M; Ko CY
    Am Surg; 2008 Oct; 74(10):997-1000. PubMed ID: 18942631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A quality evaluation methodology of health web-pages for non-professionals.
    Currò V; Buonuomo PS; Onesimo R; de Rose P; Vituzzi A; di Tanna GL; D'Atri A
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2004 Jun; 29(2):95-107. PubMed ID: 15370990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.