These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17005487)

  • 1. Telephone use: what benefit do cochlear implant users receive?
    Anderson I; Baumgartner WD; Böheim K; Nahler A; Arnoldner C; D'Haese P
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):446-53. PubMed ID: 17005487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Telephone use and understanding in patients with cochlear implants.
    Adams JS; Hasenstab MS; Pippin GW; Sismanis A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2004 Feb; 83(2):96, 99-100, 102-3. PubMed ID: 15008443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochllear implants and GSM phone.
    Sorri MJ; Huttunen KH; Välimaa TT; Karinen PJ; Löppönen HJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):54-6. PubMed ID: 11318483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mobile and landline telephone performance outcomes among telephone-using cochlear implant recipients.
    Tan BY; Gluth MB; Statham EL; Eikelboom RH; Atlas MD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Feb; 146(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 21969279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits from a mobile telephone adapter in Combi40+ cochlear implant users.
    Castro A; Lassaletta L; Bastarrica M; Perez-Mora R; Josefa De Sarria M; Gavilan J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 18568501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of telephone speech perception in individuals who received cochlear implant in the period 1993-2003.
    Rigotti PP; Costa OA; Bevilacqua MC; Nascimento LT; Alvarenga Kde F
    Codas; 2013; 25(5):400-6. PubMed ID: 24408542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Solutions to electromagnetic interference problems between cochlear implants and GSM phones.
    Sorri MJ; Piiparinen PJ; Huttunen KH; Haho MJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Mar; 14(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 16562637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting choice of device by cochlear implant candidates.
    Migirov L; Taitelbaum-Swead R; Hildesheimer M; Wolf M; Kronenberg J
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):743-6. PubMed ID: 19638937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A phone-assistive device based on Bluetooth technology for cochlear implant users.
    Qian H; Loizou PC; Dorman MF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 14518792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Musical perception and enjoyment in post-lingual patients with cochlear implants].
    Lassaletta L; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Pérez-Mora R; Herrán B; Sanz L; de Sarriá MJ; Gavilán J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 May; 59(5):228-34. PubMed ID: 18501158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of device failure in more than 23 years of clinical experience of a cochlear implant program with more than 3,400 implantees.
    Battmer RD; Linz B; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):455-63. PubMed ID: 19373120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.
    Colletti L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 17712673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear implants: growing pains.
    Parisier SC
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Sep; 113(9):1470-2. PubMed ID: 12972916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Etiology of deafness in children cochlear implant candidates in Croatia.
    Drvis P; Ajduk J; Trotić R; Ries M; Kosović V; Hat J
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Dec; 32(4):1111-3. PubMed ID: 19149216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different mobile telephones in Combi40+ users.
    Castro A; Lassaletta L; Bastarrica M; Prim MP; De Sarriá MJ; Gavilán J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 126(7):714-7. PubMed ID: 16803710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation of telephone use among cochlear implant recipients.
    Cray JW; Allen RL; Stuart A; Hudson S; Layman E; Givens GD
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 13(2):200-12. PubMed ID: 15903146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Pakistan (Lahore) cochlear implant programme: issues relating to implantation in a developing country.
    Khan MI; Mukhtar N; Saeed SR; Ramsden RT
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Aug; 121(8):745-50. PubMed ID: 17445354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.