These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17005494)

  • 1. Learning to discriminate interaural time differences: an exploratory study with amplitude-modulated stimuli.
    Rowan D; Lutman ME
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):513-20. PubMed ID: 17005494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rate dependent neural responses of interaural-time-difference cues in fine-structure and envelope.
    Hu H; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B; Vickers D
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17104. PubMed ID: 38680894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.
    Vollmer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(31):6949-6966. PubMed ID: 29959238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference Is Impaired by Deafness in Development: Evidence from Children with Early Long-term Access to Sound through Bilateral Cochlear Implants Provided Simultaneously.
    Easwar V; Yamazaki H; Deighton M; Papsin B; Gordon K
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(9):2349-2361. PubMed ID: 28123078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in the temporal course of interaural time difference sensitivity between acoustic and electric hearing in amplitude modulated stimuli.
    Hu H; Ewert SD; McAlpine D; Dietz M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1862. PubMed ID: 28372072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Long CJ; Eddington DK; Colburn HS; Rabinowitz WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1565-74. PubMed ID: 14514210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using ILD or ITD Cues for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in a Complex Listening Environment by Listeners With Bilateral and With Hearing-Preservation Cochlear Implants.
    Loiselle LH; Dorman MF; Yost WA; Cook SJ; Gifford RH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Aug; 59(4):810-8. PubMed ID: 27411035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 18091105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb C; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2272-87. PubMed ID: 23556595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural Coding of Interaural Time Differences with Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Unanesthetized Rabbits.
    Chung Y; Hancock KE; Delgutte B
    J Neurosci; 2016 May; 36(20):5520-31. PubMed ID: 27194332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning to discriminate interaural time differences at low and high frequencies.
    Rowan D; Lutman ME
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Oct; 46(10):585-94. PubMed ID: 17922348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interaural time processing when stimulus bandwidth differs at the two ears.
    Brown CA; Yost WA
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():247-54. PubMed ID: 23716230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modulation enhancement in the electrical signal improves perception of interaural time differences with bimodal stimulation.
    Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Aug; 15(4):633-47. PubMed ID: 24890714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaural spectral asymmetry and sensitivity to interaural time differences.
    Brown CA; Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL358-64. PubMed ID: 22088041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Localization and interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds for cochlear implant recipients with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear.
    Gifford RH; Grantham DW; Sheffield SW; Davis TJ; Dwyer R; Dorman MF
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():28-37. PubMed ID: 24607490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.