These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17005497)

  • 1. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
    van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
    Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children.
    Gordin A; Papsin B; James A; Gordon K
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The long-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids on postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients.
    Paasche G; Tasche C; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Aug; 30(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 19546829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups.
    Greisiger R; Shallop JK; Hol PK; Elle OJ; Jablonski GE
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16 Suppl 4():1-19. PubMed ID: 26642899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes of postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients: the short-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids.
    Paasche G; Bockel F; Tasche C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 16868511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
    Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Results with the Contour cochlear implant in patients with cochlear otosclerosis].
    Jaekel K; Aschendorff A; Klenzner T; Laszig R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Jul; 83(7):457-60. PubMed ID: 15257495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with Contour and straight Nucleus electrode arrays.
    Cohen LT; Saunders E; Knight MR; Cowan RS
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):160-75. PubMed ID: 16403611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Impedance of cochlear implant electrode array in scalae tympani].
    Du Q; Wang ZM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(46):3302-4. PubMed ID: 19159560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child.
    Polonenko MJ; Cushing SL; Gordon KA; Allemang B; Jewell S; Papsin BC
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Nov; 130(11):1007-1021. PubMed ID: 27739380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ; Connell SS; Hodges AV; Payne SL; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Angeli SI; Germani R; Messiah S; Arheart KL
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Large vestibular aqueduct syndrome: Impedance changes over time with different cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Powell HR; Birman CS
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16(6):326-30. PubMed ID: 26098963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
    Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.