These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17006719)

  • 1. Influence of alternative mammographic screening scenarios on breast cancer incidence predictions (Finland).
    Seppänen J; Heinävaara S; Hakulinen T
    Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Nov; 17(9):1135-44. PubMed ID: 17006719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Programme sensitivity and effectiveness of mammography service screening in Helsinki, Finland.
    Anttila A; Koskela J; Hakama M
    J Med Screen; 2002; 9(4):153-8. PubMed ID: 12518004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of screening mammography on the surgery of breast cancer in Finland: a population-based analysis during the years 1985-2004.
    Paajanen H; Kyhälä L; Varjo R; Rantala S
    Am Surg; 2006 Feb; 72(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 16536250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Nordic capitals, 1970-1998. Trends related to mammography screening programmes.
    Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Lynge E; Helene Olsen A; Hofvind S; Wang H; Anttila A; Hakama M; Nyström L
    Acta Oncol; 2006; 45(5):528-35. PubMed ID: 16864165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting impacts of mass-screening policy changes on breast cancer mortality.
    Seppänen J; Heinävaara S; Hakulinen T
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5235-51. PubMed ID: 18613224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating risk of breast cancer from population incidence affected by widespread mammographic screening.
    Taylor R; Boyages J
    J Med Screen; 2001; 8(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 11480447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends in breast cancer screening in Missouri from 1987 to 1995, and predictions for the years 2000 and 2010.
    Sarr M; Simoes EJ; Murayi T; Figgs LT; Brownson RC
    Mo Med; 1998 Dec; 95(12):663-9. PubMed ID: 9863343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The demands of screening mammography on surgical inpatient services of breast cancer.
    Paajanen H; Pulliainen L; Hendolin N; Hermunen H; Helle M; Dean PB
    Am Surg; 2001 Jul; 67(7):648-53. PubMed ID: 11450781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the impact of screening mammography: Breast cancer incidence and mortality rates in Connecticut (1943-2002).
    Anderson WF; Jatoi I; Devesa SS
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 16703451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of breast cancer screening in countries with intermediate and increasing incidence of breast cancer.
    Wu GH; Chen LS; Chang KJ; Hou MF; Chen SC; Liu TJ; Huang CS; Hsu GC; Yu CC; Jeng LL; Chen ST; Chou YH; Wu CY; Shin-Lan K; Chen TH;
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S23-7. PubMed ID: 17227638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammographic screening in women with a family history of breast cancer: some results from the Swedish two-county trial.
    Nixon RM; Pharoah P; Tabar L; Krusemo UB; Duffy SW; Prevost TC; Chen HH
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Aug; 48(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 11011299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Ernster VL; Barclay J; Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Henderson C
    JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(12):913-8. PubMed ID: 8598618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of screening for breast cancer on its age-incidence relationships and familial risk.
    Hemminki K; Bermejo JL
    Int J Cancer; 2005 Oct; 117(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 15880571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of natural history parameters of breast cancer based on non-randomized organized screening data: subsidiary analysis of effects of inter-screening interval, sensitivity, and attendance rate on reduction of advanced cancer.
    Wu JC; Hakama M; Anttila A; Yen AM; Malila N; Sarkeala T; Auvinen A; Chiu SY; Chen HH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jul; 122(2):553-66. PubMed ID: 20054645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data.
    Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 16434585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of different phases of an invitational screening program on breast cancer incidence.
    Seppänen J; Heinävaara S; Anttila A; Sarkeala T; Virkkunen H; Hakulinen T
    Int J Cancer; 2006 Aug; 119(4):920-4. PubMed ID: 16550598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.