These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17009861)

  • 21. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback.
    Korngreen A
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Knowledge on feet of clay].
    Dahlqvist R
    Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1405-6. PubMed ID: 18574980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Researchers' free right of publishing].
    Andersen D
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Oct; 163(44):6154. PubMed ID: 11715166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The journals must honestly tell who is doing the job].
    Bergström R
    Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1406-7. PubMed ID: 18574981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway.
    Naqvi KR
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Double-blind review: easy to guess in specialist fields.
    Lane D
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Drug industry and the new recommendations of the Vancouver group].
    Lund H
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2001 Oct; 121(24):2851. PubMed ID: 11706496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Peer Review].
    Keren G; Shemer J; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2012 Oct; 151(10):600-2, 607. PubMed ID: 23316671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Who really wrote your paper?
    Johnson M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Jan; 26(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 16338483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. To mask or not-to-mask.
    Lawson EE
    J Perinatol; 2001 Jun; 21(4):213-4. PubMed ID: 11533836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Debate on peer review. Report from an international congress on peer review].
    Grimby G
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3109-10. PubMed ID: 12198929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [More stringent requirements concerning manuscripts. Declarations of potential connections and conflicts of interest published in the Lakartidningen].
    Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Agren H; Ostergren J
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Apr; 99(15):1662-3. PubMed ID: 12025190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality evaluation needs some better quality tools.
    Döring TF
    Nature; 2007 Feb; 445(7129):709. PubMed ID: 17301769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reviewing in science requires quality criteria and professional reviewers.
    Jurkat-Rott K; Lehmann-Horn F
    Eur J Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 83(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 15202567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Citation rate unrelated to journals' impact factors.
    Waheed AA
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6966):495. PubMed ID: 14654813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Disruption to science in developing countries.
    Barcinski MA
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480. PubMed ID: 12774097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Addressing conflicts of interest and clouding of objectivity: BJSM's "peer review: fair review" section.
    Khan KM; Stovitz SD; Pluim B; Cook JL; Bahr R; Arendt EA; Noakes TD
    Br J Sports Med; 2008 Feb; 42(2):79. PubMed ID: 18256294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What do we know about peer review?
    Wessely S
    Psychol Med; 1996 Sep; 26(5):883-6. PubMed ID: 8878322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.