These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17010501)

  • 1. Factors associated with the length of the latent phase during labor induction.
    Grobman WA; Simon C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jun; 132(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 17010501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When has an induction failed?
    Simon CE; Grobman WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):705-9. PubMed ID: 15802394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.
    Vahratian A; Zhang J; Troendle JF; Sciscione AC; Hoffman MK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 15802393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction.
    Nuthalapaty FS; Rouse DJ; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 14990405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication.
    Dublin S; Lydon-Rochelle M; Kaplan RC; Watts DH; Critchlow CW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 183(4):986-94. PubMed ID: 11035351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The association between the length of first stage of labor, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor.
    Cheng YW; Delaney SS; Hopkins LM; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):477.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19608153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Graphic analysis of actively managed labor: prospective computation of labor progress in 500 consecutive nulliparous women in spontaneous labor at term.
    Impey L; Hobson J; O'herlihy C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 10942483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of women presenting in active versus latent phase of spontaneous labor.
    Bailit JL; Dierker L; Blanchard MH; Mercer BM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 105(1):77-9. PubMed ID: 15625145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
    Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N
    Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
    Ennen CS; Bofill JA; Magann EF; Bass JD; Chauhan SP; Morrison JC
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 67(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 18971583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in cervical nitric oxide concentration correlate with Bishop score and cervical length modifications in prostaglandin E2-mediated induction of labor.
    Chiossi G; Verocchi G; Venturini P; Facchinetti F
    J Soc Gynecol Investig; 2006 Apr; 13(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 16638591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does length of labor vary by maternal age?
    Greenberg MB; Cheng YW; Sullivan M; Norton ME; Hopkins LM; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 197(4):428.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17904990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of coitus at term on length of gestation, induction of labor, and mode of delivery.
    Tan PC; Andi A; Azmi N; Noraihan MN
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):134-40. PubMed ID: 16816067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Latent phase of labor in normal patients: a reassessment.
    Peisner DB; Rosen MG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):644-8. PubMed ID: 4058822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of latent phase factors associated with active labor duration in low-risk nulliparous women with spontaneous contractions.
    Dencker A; Berg M; Bergqvist L; Lilja H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1034-9. PubMed ID: 20636242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association and risk factors between induction of labor and cesarean section.
    Yogev Y; Hiersch L; Yariv O; Peled Y; Wiznitzer A; Melamed N
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Nov; 26(17):1733-6. PubMed ID: 23617706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elective induction of labor: failure to follow guidelines and risk of cesarean delivery.
    Le Ray C; Carayol M; Bréart G; Goffinet F;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(6):657-65. PubMed ID: 17520395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.