These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17010795)

  • 1. Variability in fluoroscopic X-ray exposure in contemporary cardiac catheterization laboratories.
    Laskey WK; Wondrow M; Holmes DR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Oct; 48(7):1361-4. PubMed ID: 17010795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluoroscopic image quality in the film and filmless eras: a standardized comparison performed in coronary interventional facilities.
    Laskey W; Wondrow M; Chambers C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Mar; 58(3):383-90. PubMed ID: 12594708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures: conventional fluoroscopy versus pulsed fluoroscopy.
    Chida K; Fuda K; Saito H; Takai Y; Takahashi S; Yamada S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jan; 69(1):115-21; discussion 122. PubMed ID: 17139653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of x-ray exposures using mailed thermoluminescent dosimeters.
    Aldrich JE; Andrew JW
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1981 Dec; 32(4):202-5. PubMed ID: 7328097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Radiologic practice and radioprotection in Italian hemodynamic laboratories].
    Steffenino G; Ribichini F; Dellavalle A; Rossetti V; Cerati R; Garbarino M; Russo P; Uslenghi E
    Cardiologia; 1996 Jan; 41(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8697469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of optical and electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation systems for fluoroscopic targeting.
    Ricci WM; Russell TA; Kahler DM; Terrill-Grisoni L; Culley P
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Mar; 22(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 18317053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Obesity is a major determinant of radiation dose in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation.
    Ector J; Dragusin O; Adriaenssens B; Huybrechts W; Willems R; Ector H; Heidbüchel H
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jul; 50(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 17631216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose.
    Justino H
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):146-53. PubMed ID: 16862415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: insights from the National Research Council's Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report.
    Venneri L; Rossi F; Botto N; Andreassi MG; Salcone N; Emad A; Lazzeri M; Gori C; Vano E; Picano E
    Am Heart J; 2009 Jan; 157(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 19081407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variations in x-ray exposures to patients.
    Taylor KW; Patt NL; Johns HE
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1979 Mar; 30(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 429443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiac catheterization-induced acute radiation dermatitis presenting as a fixed drug eruption.
    Schecter AK; Lewis MD; Robinson-Bostom L; Pan TD
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2003 Aug; 2(4):425-7. PubMed ID: 12884469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occupational radiation doses to operators performing cardiac catheterization procedures.
    Kim KP; Miller DL; Balter S; Kleinerman RA; Linet MS; Kwon D; Simon SL
    Health Phys; 2008 Mar; 94(3):211-27. PubMed ID: 18301095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
    Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality evaluation and patient dose assessment of medical fluoroscopic X-ray systems: a national study.
    Economides S; Hourdakis CJ; Kalivas N; Kalathaki M; Simantirakis G; Tritakis P; Manousaridis G; Vogiatzi S; Kipouros P; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 17971345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exposure reduction through quality assurance for diagnostic x-ray procedures.
    Lipoti JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):577-85. PubMed ID: 18849692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of performance of a new digital image intensifier fluoroscopy system.
    Dimov A; Vassileva J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):123-6. PubMed ID: 18469348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise reduction in low-dose x-ray fluoroscopy for image-guided radiation therapy.
    Wang J; Zhu L; Xing L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jun; 74(2):637-43. PubMed ID: 19427563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comprehensive I-125 multi-seed comparison for prostate brachytherapy: dosimetry and visibility analysis.
    Al-Qaisieh B; Smith DW; Brearley E; St Clair S; Bownes P
    Radiother Oncol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 17588696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.