BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17010838)

  • 1. Controls required to assess IOL movement during accommodation.
    Schachar RA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1593. PubMed ID: 17010838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pseudophakic accommodation with 2 models of foldable intraocular lenses.
    Vámosi P; Nemeth G; Berta A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Feb; 32(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 16564996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pseudophakic accommodation and pseudoaccommodation under physiological conditions measured with partial coherence interferometry.
    Tsorbatzoglou A; Németh G; Máth J; Berta A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1345-50. PubMed ID: 16863973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes.
    Kriechbaum K; Findl O; Koeppl C; Menapace R; Drexler W
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 15745773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.
    Ossma IL; Galvis A; Vargas LG; Trager MJ; Vagefi MR; McLeod SD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17189792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Initial report of IOL-induced accommodation.
    Osher RH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2009; author reply 2009. PubMed ID: 19027540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pupil dilation with intracameral lidocaine during phacoemulsification.
    Jayadev C; Nayak BK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1503; author reply 1503. PubMed ID: 17720056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept.
    Alió JL; Ben-nun J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Plaza AB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1671-8. PubMed ID: 19781458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of the crystalens.
    Cumming JS
    J Refract Surg; 2006 Sep; 22(7):633-4; author reply 634-5. PubMed ID: 16995542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of patient motivation on near vision in pseudophakic patients.
    Leydolt C; Neumayer T; Prinz A; Findl O
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):398-405.e3. PubMed ID: 19019338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes.
    Schachar RA
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Dec; 112(12):2241; author reply 2241-2. PubMed ID: 16325720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraindividual comparison of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses of same material and platform.
    Ohtani S; Miyata K; Samejima T; Honbou M; Oshika T
    Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):896-901. PubMed ID: 19410948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis of accommodating intraocular lenses.
    Findl O; Leydolt C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):522-7. PubMed ID: 17321405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens.
    Langenbucher A; Huber S; Nguyen NX; Seitz B; Gusek-Schneider GC; Küchle M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Apr; 29(4):677-85. PubMed ID: 12686234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inclusion of nonchanging positional references.
    Schachar RA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):957-8; author reply 958. PubMed ID: 19465256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction.
    Findl O; Kiss B; Petternel V; Menapace R; Georgopoulos M; Rainer G; Drexler W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Apr; 29(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 12686233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optical quality of the eye after lens replacement with a pseudoaccommodating intraocular lens.
    Montés-Micó R; Ferrer-Blasco T; Charman WN; Cerviño A; Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 18471630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of the 1CU accommodating IOL.
    Galand A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):3; author reply 3-4. PubMed ID: 16516759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety of intracameral mydriasis in phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
    Soong T; Soultanidis M; Claoué C; Gallagher M; Thomson S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Mar; 32(3):375-6. PubMed ID: 16631031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional reading acuity and performance: Comparison of 2 accommodating intraocular lenses.
    Brown D; Dougherty P; Gills JP; Hunkeler J; Sanders DR; Sanders ML
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1711-4. PubMed ID: 19781464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.