These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17010897)

  • 1. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression.
    Tredway TL
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2006 Oct; 17(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 17010897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older.
    Rosen DS; O'Toole JE; Eichholz KM; Hrubes M; Huo D; Sandhu FA; Fessler RG
    Neurosurgery; 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10. PubMed ID: 17327795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Podichetty VK; Spears J; Isaacs RE; Booher J; Biscup RS
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 May; 19(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 16770211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
    Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of combined osteoporotic compression fractures and spinal stenosis: use of vertebral augumentation and interspinous process spacer.
    Miller JD; Nader R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(19):E717-20. PubMed ID: 18758354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive operative management for lumbar spinal stenosis: overview of early and long-term outcomes.
    Asgarzadie F; Khoo LT
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2007 Jul; 38(3):387-99; abstract vi-vii. PubMed ID: 17629986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis.
    Khoo LT; Fessler RG
    Neurosurgery; 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S146-54. PubMed ID: 12234442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interspinous process decompression (IPD) system (X-STOP) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Chiu JC
    Surg Technol Int; 2006; 15():265-75. PubMed ID: 17029185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally disruptive decompression and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ozgur BM; Hughes SA; Baird LC; Taylor WR
    Spine J; 2006; 6(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 16413444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence].
    Robaina-Padrón FJ
    Neurocirugia (Astur); 2007 Oct; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 18008014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Microscope-assisted minimally invasive decompression for degenerative lower lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Chen X; Ge XF; Yan L
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Oct; 22(10):757-8. PubMed ID: 19902754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complications of open compared to minimally invasive lumbar spine decompression.
    Shih P; Wong AP; Smith TR; Lee AI; Fessler RG
    J Clin Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 18(10):1360-4. PubMed ID: 21775145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical advances in minimally invasive surgery: direct decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Lauryssen C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Dec; 35(26 Suppl):S287-93. PubMed ID: 21160392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive cervical stenosis decompression.
    Song JK; Christie SD
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2006 Oct; 17(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 17010892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques.
    Bresnahan L; Ogden AT; Natarajan RN; Fessler RG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 19127157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar stenosis and disc herniation.
    Armin SS; Holly LT; Khoo LT
    Neurosurg Focus; 2008; 25(2):E11. PubMed ID: 18673040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in younger age patients could lead to higher stresses in the remaining neural arch -- a finite element investigation.
    Ivanov A; Faizan A; Sairyo K; Ebraheim N; Biyani A; Goel VK
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2007 Feb; 50(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17546538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Lawrence MM; Hayek SM
    Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2013 Oct; 26(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 23963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Fu YS; Zeng BF; Xu JG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 18317196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.