306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17011748)
21. Detection of Francisella tularensis and analysis of bacterial growth in ticks in Japan.
Suzuki J; Hashino M; Matsumoto S; Takano A; Kawabata H; Takada N; Andoh M; Oikawa Y; Kajita H; Uda A; Watanabe K; Shimizu T; Watarai M
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2016 Oct; 63(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 27432517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic procedures in tularaemia with special focus on molecular and immunological techniques.
Splettstoesser WD; Tomaso H; Al Dahouk S; Neubauer H; Schuff-Werner P
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2005 Aug; 52(6):249-61. PubMed ID: 16219088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The development of tools for diagnosis of tularemia and typing of Francisella tularensis.
Johansson A; Forsman M; Sjöstedt A
APMIS; 2004; 112(11-12):898-907. PubMed ID: 15638842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the utility of five commercial kits for extraction of DNA from Aspergillus fumigatus spores.
Nawrot U; Wlodarczyk K; Wrobel M; Wasik A; Dobosz T
Acta Biochim Pol; 2010; 57(4):567-71. PubMed ID: 20978634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of five methods for extracting DNA from paucicellular clinical samples.
Cler L; Bu D; Lewis C; Euhus D
Mol Cell Probes; 2006; 20(3-4):191-6. PubMed ID: 16516438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A multiplexed PCR-coupled liquid bead array for the simultaneous detection of four biothreat agents.
Wilson WJ; Erler AM; Nasarabadi SL; Skowronski EW; Imbro PM
Mol Cell Probes; 2005 Apr; 19(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 15680215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for isolation and purification of bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils.
Mahmoudi N; Slater GF; Fulthorpe RR
Can J Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 57(8):623-8. PubMed ID: 21815819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Molecular Epidemiology of Francisella tularensis in the United States.
Kugeler KJ; Mead PS; Janusz AM; Staples JE; Kubota KA; Chalcraft LG; Petersen JM
Clin Infect Dis; 2009 Apr; 48(7):863-70. PubMed ID: 19245342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Real time PCR hybridization for the rapid and specific identification of Francisella tularensis].
Bielawska-Drózd A; Niemcewicz M; Gaweł J; Bartoszcze M; Graniak G; Joniec J; Kołodziej M
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2010; 62(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 21473100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Genotyping of the Francisella tularensis strains isolated from natural foci of tularemia in the Rostov region by multilocus VNTR analysis].
Vodop'ianov AS; Pavlovich NV; Vodop'ianov SO; Suchkov IIu; Pichurina NL; Mishan'kin BN
Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol; 2004; (2):24-8. PubMed ID: 15164717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development of a sensitive detection system for Cryptosporidium in environmental samples.
Ramirez NE; Sreevatsan S
Vet Parasitol; 2006 Mar; 136(3-4):201-13. PubMed ID: 16387443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection and quantification of Entomophaga maimaiga resting spores in forest soil using real-time PCR.
Castrillo LA; Thomsen L; Juneja P; Hajek AE
Mycol Res; 2007 Mar; 111(Pt 3):324-31. PubMed ID: 17363233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detection of diverse new Francisella-like bacteria in environmental samples.
Barns SM; Grow CC; Okinaka RT; Keim P; Kuske CR
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 71(9):5494-500. PubMed ID: 16151142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of DNA extraction procedures for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer, in clinical and environmental specimens.
Durnez L; Stragier P; Roebben K; Ablordey A; Leirs H; Portaels F
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Feb; 76(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 18973778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative evaluation of in-house manual, and commercial semi-automated and automated DNA extraction platforms in the sample preparation of human stool specimens for a Salmonella enterica 5'-nuclease assay.
Schuurman T; de Boer R; Patty R; Kooistra-Smid M; van Zwet A
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Dec; 71(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 17942177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detection of Francisella tularensis by the polymerase chain reaction.
Junhui Z; Ruifu Y; Jianchun L; Songle Z; Meiling C; Fengxiang C; Hong C
J Med Microbiol; 1996 Dec; 45(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 8958253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Francisella tularensis--feature of pathogen, pathogenesis, diagnostics].
Osiak B; Bartoszcze M; Gawel J
Przegl Epidemiol; 2006; 60(3):601-8. PubMed ID: 17249186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An evaluation of commercial DNA extraction kits for the isolation of bacterial spore DNA from soil.
Dineen SM; Aranda R; Anders DL; Robertson JM
J Appl Microbiol; 2010 Dec; 109(6):1886-96. PubMed ID: 20666869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of antibodies to Francisella tularensis in cats.
Magnarelli L; Levy S; Koski R
Res Vet Sci; 2007 Feb; 82(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 16914176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of seven commercial DNA extraction kits for the recovery of Brucella DNA from spiked human serum samples using real-time PCR.
Queipo-Ortuño MI; Tena F; Colmenero JD; Morata P
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2008 Feb; 27(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17973130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
