These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17011792)

  • 1. Smoothing and cluster thresholding for cortical surface-based group analysis of fMRI data.
    Hagler DJ; Saygin AP; Sereno MI
    Neuroimage; 2006 Dec; 33(4):1093-103. PubMed ID: 17011792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical thickness analysis in autism with heat kernel smoothing.
    Chung MK; Robbins SM; Dalton KM; Davidson RJ; Alexander AL; Evans AC
    Neuroimage; 2005 May; 25(4):1256-65. PubMed ID: 15850743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A high performance 3D cluster-based test of unsmoothed fMRI data.
    Li H; Nickerson LD; Xiong J; Zou Q; Fan Y; Ma Y; Shi T; Ge J; Gao JH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Sep; 98():537-46. PubMed ID: 24836011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial accuracy of fMRI activation influenced by volume- and surface-based spatial smoothing techniques.
    Jo HJ; Lee JM; Kim JH; Shin YW; Kim IY; Kwon JS; Kim SI
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jan; 34(2):550-64. PubMed ID: 17110131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Artificial shifting of fMRI activation localized by volume- and surface-based analyses.
    Jo HJ; Lee JM; Kim JH; Choi CH; Gu BM; Kang DH; Ku J; Kwon JS; Kim SI
    Neuroimage; 2008 Apr; 40(3):1077-89. PubMed ID: 18291680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cluster-level statistical inference in fMRI datasets: The unexpected behavior of random fields in high dimensions.
    Bansal R; Peterson BS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 49():101-115. PubMed ID: 29408478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A voxelation-corrected non-stationary 3D cluster-size test based on random field theory.
    Li H; Nickerson LD; Zhao X; Nichols TE; Gao JH
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():676-82. PubMed ID: 26067343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Denoising functional MR images: a comparison of wavelet denoising and Gaussian smoothing.
    Wink AM; Roerdink JB
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):374-87. PubMed ID: 15027530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining the optimal level of smoothing in cortical thickness analysis: a hierarchical approach based on sequential statistical thresholding.
    Bernal-Rusiel JL; Atienza M; Cantero JL
    Neuroimage; 2010 Aug; 52(1):158-71. PubMed ID: 20362677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deformation-based surface morphometry applied to gray matter deformation.
    Chung MK; Worsley KJ; Robbins S; Paus T; Taylor J; Giedd JN; Rapoport JL; Evans AC
    Neuroimage; 2003 Feb; 18(2):198-213. PubMed ID: 12595176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical thickness analysis examined through power analysis and a population simulation.
    Lerch JP; Evans AC
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):163-73. PubMed ID: 15588607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations.
    Woo CW; Krishnan A; Wager TD
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():412-9. PubMed ID: 24412399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of spatial smoothing on inter-subject correlation based analysis of FMRI.
    Pajula J; Tohka J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 32(9):1114-24. PubMed ID: 24970023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Projection of fMRI data onto the cortical surface using anatomically-informed convolution kernels.
    Operto G; Bulot R; Anton JL; Coulon O
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 17931891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cluster mass permutation test with contextual enhancement for fMRI activation detection.
    Tillikainen L; Salli E; Korvenoja A; Aronen HJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):654-64. PubMed ID: 16769226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Data-analytical stability of cluster-wise and peak-wise inference in fMRI data analysis.
    Roels SP; Bossier H; Loeys T; Moerkerke B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 240():37-47. PubMed ID: 25445059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of spatial smoothing on fMRI group inferences.
    Mikl M; Marecek R; Hlustík P; Pavlicová M; Drastich A; Chlebus P; Brázdil M; Krupa P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 26(4):490-503. PubMed ID: 18060720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method for anisotropic spatial smoothing of functional magnetic resonance images using distance transformation of a structural image.
    Nam H; Lee D; Lee JD; Park HJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(15):5063-77. PubMed ID: 21772082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of fMRI motion correction software tools.
    Oakes TR; Johnstone T; Ores Walsh KS; Greischar LL; Alexander AL; Fox AS; Davidson RJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(3):529-43. PubMed ID: 16099178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of focal changes in human cortical thickness: spherical wavelets versus Gaussian smoothing.
    Bernal-Rusiel JL; Atienza M; Cantero JL
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jul; 41(4):1278-92. PubMed ID: 18474434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.