BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17012719)

  • 1. A two-year clinical evaluation of pit and fissure sealants placed with and without air abrasion pretreatment in teenagers.
    Yazici AR; Kiremitçi A; Celik C; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Oct; 137(10):1401-5. PubMed ID: 17012719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of acid versus laser etching on the clinical performance of a fissure sealant: 24-month results.
    Karaman E; Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gorucu J
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 23092148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pit and Fissure Sealant Retention Following Air Abrasion Preparation with Bioactive Glass and Aluminum Oxide Particles.
    Khoroushi M; Eshghi A; Naderibeni F
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2016 Sep; 83(3):132-138. PubMed ID: 28327263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and air abrasion on shear bond strength of a fissure sealant to enamel.
    Moslemi M; Erfanparast L; Fekrazad R; Tadayon N; Dadjo H; Shadkar MM; Khalili Z
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Feb; 141(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 20123873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of retention of pit and fissure sealants placed with and without air abrasion pretreatment in 6-8 year old children - An
    Bhushan U; Goswami M
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Feb; 9(2):e211-e217. PubMed ID: 28210438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Erbas Unverdi G; Atac SA; Cehreli ZC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2235-2243. PubMed ID: 27900529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of fissure morphology and pretreatment of the enamel surface on penetration and adhesion of fissure sealants.
    Symons AL; Chu CY; Meyers IA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Dec; 23(12):791-8. PubMed ID: 8971640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical trial of a self-etching adhesive for sealant application: success at 24 months with Prompt L-Pop.
    Feigal RJ; Quelhas I
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):249-51. PubMed ID: 14579879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro evaluation of different techniques of enamel preparation for pit and fissure sealing.
    Courson F; Renda AM; Attal JP; Bouter D; Ruse D; Degrange M
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 15008338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage and bond strength of sealant to primary enamel comparing air abrasion and acid etch techniques.
    Knobloch LA; Meyer T; Kerby RE; Johnston W
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):463-9. PubMed ID: 16532886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of sealant placement techniques and 12-month retention rates.
    Kanellis MJ; Warren JJ; Levy SM
    J Public Health Dent; 2000; 60(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 10734618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of topical fluoride on retention of pit and fissure sealants.
    Warren DP; Infante NB; Rice HC; Turner SD; Chan JT
    J Dent Hyg; 2001; 75(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 11314222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a one-step conditioning agent in sealant placement: 6-month results.
    Burbridge L; Nugent Z; Deery C
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2006 Nov; 16(6):424-30. PubMed ID: 17014541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of a pit-and-fissure sealant: effect of air-abrasion compared with classical enamel preparations.
    Lupi-Pégurier L; Muller-Bolla M; Bertrand MF; Fradet T; Bolla M
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15119586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of pumice, fissure enameloplasty and air abrasion on sealant microleakage.
    Blackwood JA; Dilley DC; Roberts MW; Swift EJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 12064490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-vitro microleakage of repaired fissure sealants: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Srinivasan V; Deery C; Nugent Z
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jan; 15(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 15663445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study.
    Subramaniam P; Konde S; Mandanna DK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 18923223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of air abrasion versus acid etch sealant techniques: six-month retention.
    Kanellis MJ; Warren JJ; Levy SM
    Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 9200197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of a self-etching adhesive on sealant retention in primary teeth.
    Maher MM; Elkashlan HI; El-Housseiny AA
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 23930635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of fissure sealants using two different methods of application in teeth with hypomineralised molars (MIH): a 4 year clinical study.
    Lygidakis NA; Dimou G; Stamataki E
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Dec; 10(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 19995506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.