These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
808 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17014301)
1. The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Bogacz R; Brown E; Moehlis J; Holmes P; Cohen JD Psychol Rev; 2006 Oct; 113(4):700-65. PubMed ID: 17014301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal decision making in neural inhibition models. van Ravenzwaaij D; van der Maas HL; Wagenmakers EJ Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):201-15. PubMed ID: 22103672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-stage dynamic signal detection: a theory of choice, decision time, and confidence. Pleskac TJ; Busemeyer JR Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):864-901. PubMed ID: 20658856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimality and some of its discontents: successes and shortcomings of existing models for binary decisions. Holmes P; Cohen JD Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Apr; 6(2):258-78. PubMed ID: 24648411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Context effects in multi-alternative decision making: empirical data and a Bayesian model. Hawkins G; Brown SD; Steyvers M; Wagenmakers EJ Cogn Sci; 2012 Apr; 36(3):498-516. PubMed ID: 22257112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Heuristic and linear models of judgment: matching rules and environments. Hogarth RM; Karelaia N Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):733-58. PubMed ID: 17638504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust decision making in a nonlinear world. Dougherty MR; Thomas RP Psychol Rev; 2012 Apr; 119(2):321-44. PubMed ID: 22329684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision strategies for the two-alternative forced choice reminder paradigm. Hautus MJ; Shepherd D; Peng M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):729-37. PubMed ID: 21264694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Explaining purportedly irrational behavior by modeling skepticism in task parameters: an example examining confidence in forced-choice tasks. McKenzie CR; Wixted JT; Noelle DC J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Sep; 30(5):947-59. PubMed ID: 15355128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How should witnesses regulate the accuracy of their identification decisions: one step forward, two steps back? Perfect TJ; Weber N J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1810-8. PubMed ID: 22563633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subjective confidence in perceptual judgments: a test of the self-consistency model. Koriat A J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Feb; 140(1):117-39. PubMed ID: 21299320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation. Brown SD; Heathcote A Cogn Psychol; 2008 Nov; 57(3):153-78. PubMed ID: 18243170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reinforcement learning and decision making in monkeys during a competitive game. Lee D; Conroy ML; McGreevy BP; Barraclough DJ Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 22(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15561500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Neural mechanisms of decision making]. Funahashi S Brain Nerve; 2008 Sep; 60(9):1017-27. PubMed ID: 18807936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]