These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17014509)

  • 21. Comparisons of Kt/V evaluated using an online method and calculated from urea measurements in patients on intermittent hemodialysis.
    Grzegorzewska AE; Banachowicz W
    Hemodial Int; 2006 Oct; 10 Suppl 2():S5-9. PubMed ID: 17022752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Control of the dialysis dose by ionic dialysance and bioimpedance].
    Teruel JL; Alvarez Rangel LE; Fernández Lucas M; Merino JL; Liaño F; Rivera M; Marcén R; Ortuño J
    Nefrologia; 2007; 27(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 17402882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of targeting Kt instead of Kt/V.
    Maduell F; Ramos R; Palomares I; Martín-Malo A; Molina M; Bustamante J; Pérez-García R; Grassmann A; Merello JI;
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2595-603. PubMed ID: 24078643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Estimate of the dialysis dose using ionic dialysance].
    Teruel JL; Fernández Lucas M; Marcén R; Rodríguez JR; Rivera M; Liaño F; Ortuño J
    Nefrologia; 2001; 21(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11344966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Survival comparison between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis based on matched doses of delivered therapy.
    Keshaviah P; Collins AJ; Ma JZ; Churchill DN; Thorpe KE
    J Am Soc Nephrol; 2002 Jan; 13 Suppl 1():S48-52. PubMed ID: 11792762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of hemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: comparison to standard method of urea removal.
    Racki S; Zaputović L; Maleta I; Grzetić M; Mavrić Z; Devcić B; Vujicić B
    Ren Fail; 2005; 27(5):601-4. PubMed ID: 16153000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Ionic dialysance and quality control in hemodialysis].
    Petitclerc T; Coevoet B
    Nephrologie; 2001; 22(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 11572165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Urea distribution volume and ionic dialysance].
    Pozzoni P; Pozzi M; Di Filippo S
    G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21 Suppl 30():S226-30. PubMed ID: 15750991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Causes of impaired delivery of hemodialysis prescription.
    Fourtounas C; Kopelias I; Paraskevopoulos A; Dimitriadis G; Agroyannis B
    Artif Organs; 2006 Nov; 30(11):878-81. PubMed ID: 17062111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ionic dialysance: a new valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency in acute renal failure?
    Ridel C; Osman D; Mercadal L; Anguel N; Petitclerc T; Richard C; Vinsonneau C
    Intensive Care Med; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-5. PubMed ID: 17235509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys?
    Locatelli F; Buoncristiani U; Canaud B; Köhler H; Petitclerc T; Zucchelli P
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 Jan; 20(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 15632348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Non-invasive monitoring of effective dialysis dose delivered to the haemodialysis patient.
    Petitclerc T; Béné B; Jacobs C; Jaudon MC; Goux N
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1995; 10(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 7753455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of the length of each hemodialysis session by on-line dialysate urea monitoring.
    Hernandez-Herrera G; Martin-Malo A; Rodriguez M; Aljama P
    Nephron; 2001 Sep; 89(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 11528230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Disease severity adversely affects delivery of dialysis in acute renal failure.
    Schiffl H
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2007; 107(4):c163-9. PubMed ID: 17975323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Barriers to the delivery of adequate hemodialysis in ESRD Network 4.
    Palevsky PM; Washington MS; Stevenson JA; Rohay JM; Dyer NJ; Lockett R; Perry SB
    Adv Ren Replace Ther; 2000 Oct; 7(4 Suppl 1):S11-20. PubMed ID: 11053582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Urea distribution volume calculated by ionic dialysance].
    Teruel JL; Merino JL; Fernández-Lucas M; Tenorio MT; Rivera M; Marcén R; Ortuño J
    Nefrologia; 2006; 26(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 16649433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy and clinical utility of dialysis dose measurement using online ionic dialysance.
    Katopodis KP; Hoenich NA
    Clin Nephrol; 2002 Mar; 57(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 11924753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is single-needle hemodialysis still a good treatment in end-stage renal disease?
    Trakarnvanich T; Chirananthavat T; Maneerat P; Chabsuwan S; Areeyakulnimit S
    Blood Purif; 2007; 25(5-6):490-6. PubMed ID: 18187939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Target quantity for twice-a-week hemodialysis: the EKR (equivalent renal urea clearance) approach.
    Manotham K; Tiranathanagul K; Praditpornsilpa K; Eiam-Ong S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Aug; 89 Suppl 2():S79-85. PubMed ID: 17044458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Use of averaged concentration of urea and whole body urea clearance in prescribing the length of a dialysis session].
    Robles NR; Gonzalez-Reymundo J; Cruz A; Gomez-Ainsua C; Calderon MT; Carande J
    An Med Interna; 1996 Jan; 13(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8679818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.