These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17014666)

  • 1. Diagnostic validity of three swab techniques for identifying chronic wound infection.
    Gardner SE; Frantz RA; Saltzman CL; Hillis SL; Park H; Scherubel M
    Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(5):548-57. PubMed ID: 17014666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Validity of Semiquantitative Swab Cultures.
    Gardner SE; Frantz R; Hillis SL; Park H; Scherubel M
    Wounds; 2007 Feb; 19(2):31-8. PubMed ID: 26111411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample procurement for cultures of infected wounds: a systematic review.
    Copeland-Halperin LR; Kaminsky AJ; Bluefeld N; Miraliakbari R
    J Wound Care; 2016 Apr; 25(4):S4-6, S8-10. PubMed ID: 27068349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Swab cultures accurately identify bacterial pathogens in diabetic foot wounds not involving bone.
    Slater RA; Lazarovitch T; Boldur I; Ramot Y; Buchs A; Weiss M; Hindi A; Rapoport MJ
    Diabet Med; 2004 Jul; 21(7):705-9. PubMed ID: 15209762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The clinical efficacy of two semi-quantitative wound-swabbing techniques in identifying the causative organism(s) in infected cutaneous wounds.
    Angel DE; Lloyd P; Carville K; Santamaria N
    Int Wound J; 2011 Apr; 8(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 21303456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Swab versus biopsy for the diagnosis of chronic infected wounds.
    Rondas AA; Schols JM; Halfens RJ; Stobberingh EE
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 May; 26(5):211-9. PubMed ID: 23591095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CODIFI (Concordance in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Infection): a cross-sectional study of wound swab versus tissue sampling in infected diabetic foot ulcers in England.
    Nelson A; Wright-Hughes A; Backhouse MR; Lipsky BA; Nixon J; Bhogal MS; Reynolds C; Brown S;
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e019437. PubMed ID: 29391370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of bacteriologic culture results for skin wound swabs and skin wound biopsy specimens.
    Stokes RA; Coleman MC; Rogovskyy AS; Dickerson VM; Thieman Mankin KM
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2021 Dec; 259(12):1416-1421. PubMed ID: 34757939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quantitative swab culture and smear: A quick, simple method for determining the number of viable aerobic bacteria on open wounds.
    Levine NS; Lindberg RB; Mason AD; Pruitt BA
    J Trauma; 1976 Feb; 16(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 1255833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic performance of swab PCR as an alternative to tissue culture methods for diagnosing infections associated with fracture fixation devices.
    Omar M; Suero EM; Liodakis E; Reichling M; Guenther D; Decker S; Stiesch M; Krettek C; Eberhard J
    Injury; 2016 Jul; 47(7):1421-6. PubMed ID: 27181839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of two culturing methods for chronic wounds.
    Neil JA; Munro CL
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1997 Apr; 43(3):20-2, 24, 26 passim. PubMed ID: 9205389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Atypical agents of wound infection and targeted samples].
    Kucisec-Tepes N
    Acta Med Croatica; 2012 Oct; 66 Suppl 1():71-7. PubMed ID: 23193825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Superficial swab versus deep-tissue biopsy for the microbiological diagnosis of local infection in advanced-stage pressure ulcers of spinal-cord-injured patients: a prospective study.
    Tedeschi S; Negosanti L; Sgarzani R; Trapani F; Pignanelli S; Battilana M; Capirossi R; Brillanti Ventura D; Giannella M; Bartoletti M; Tumietto F; Cristini F; Viale P
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2017 Dec; 23(12):943-947. PubMed ID: 28433727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of chronic wound culture techniques: swab versus curetted tissue for microbial recovery.
    Smith ME; Robinowitz N; Chaulk P; Johnson K
    Br J Community Nurs; 2014 Sep; Suppl(9 0):S22-6. PubMed ID: 25192558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A quantitative swab is a good non-invasive alternative to a quantitative biopsy for quantifying bacterial load in wounds healing by second intention in horses.
    Van Hecke LL; Hermans K; Haspeslagh M; Chiers K; Pint E; Boyen F; Martens AM
    Vet J; 2017 Jul; 225():63-68. PubMed ID: 28720301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Culture results from wound biopsy versus wound swab: does it matter for the assessment of wound infection?
    Haalboom M; Blokhuis-Arkes MHE; Beuk RJ; Meerwaldt R; Klont R; Schijffelen MJ; Bowler PB; Burnet M; Sigl E; van der Palen JAM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2019 May; 25(5):629.e7-629.e12. PubMed ID: 30145403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of ultraviolet light C on bacterial colonization in chronic wounds.
    Thai TP; Keast DH; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Houghton PE
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Oct; 51(10):32-45. PubMed ID: 16230765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative swab culture versus tissue biopsy: a comparison in chronic wounds.
    Bill TJ; Ratliff CR; Donovan AM; Knox LK; Morgan RF; Rodeheaver GT
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2001 Jan; 47(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 11889654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When and How to Perform Cultures on Chronic Wounds?
    Stallard Y
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2018; 45(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 29521930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative culture technique and infection in complex wounds of the extremities closed with free flaps.
    Breidenbach WC; Trager S
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1995 Apr; 95(5):860-5. PubMed ID: 7708870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.