These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17014666)

  • 21. A cross-sectional validation study of using NERDS and STONEES to assess bacterial burden.
    Woo KY; Sibbald RG
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Aug; 55(8):40-8. PubMed ID: 19717855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of 4 methods of bacterial count determination in burn wounds].
    Winkler M; Erbs G; König W; Müller FE
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1987 Jun; 265(1-2):82-98. PubMed ID: 3314260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rapid enzyme analysis as a diagnostic tool for wound infection: Comparison between clinical judgment, microbiological analysis, and enzyme analysis.
    Blokhuis-Arkes MH; Haalboom M; van der Palen J; Heinzle A; Sigl E; Guebitz G; Beuk R
    Wound Repair Regen; 2015; 23(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 25816836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bacteriology of wound infection: evaluation by surface swab and quantitative full thickness wound biopsy culture.
    Basak S; Dutta SK; Gupta S; Ganguly AC; De R
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1992 Feb; 90(2):33-4. PubMed ID: 1588115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Best technique for obtaining wound cultures.
    Spear M
    Plast Surg Nurs; 2012; 32(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 22395174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Indications and practical implementation of microbiologic diagnostics in patients with chronic wounds.
    Schwarzkopf A; Dissemond J
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2015 Mar; 13(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 25721627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prospective evaluation of the influence of sampling method on bacterial culture results and antimicrobial selection in 52 dogs with infected wounds.
    Concannon TM; Kidd L; Osmond C; Dong F; Griffon D
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2020 Mar; 30(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 32056364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Swab and aspiration specimen collection methods and antibiogram in chronic suppurative otitis media at Jos University Teaching Hospital: Which is superior?
    Adoga AS; Ma'an EN; Malu D; Badung BP; Obiesie IV; Nwaorgu OG
    Ann Afr Med; 2010; 9(4):230-4. PubMed ID: 20935423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A new technique for quantitative bacterial assessment on burn wounds by modified dermabrasion.
    Pallua N; Fuchs PC; Hafemann B; Völpel U; Noah M; Lütticken R
    J Hosp Infect; 1999 Aug; 42(4):329-37. PubMed ID: 10467547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does this patient have an infection of a chronic wound?
    Reddy M; Gill SS; Wu W; Kalkar SR; Rochon PA
    JAMA; 2012 Feb; 307(6):605-11. PubMed ID: 22318282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is a wound swab for microbiological analysis supportive in the clinical assessment of infection of a chronic wound?
    Rondas AA; Halfens RJ; Schols JM; Thiesen KP; Trienekens TA; Stobberingh EE
    Future Microbiol; 2015; 10(11):1815-24. PubMed ID: 26597427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Swab cultures for diagnosing wound infections: a literature review and clinical guideline.
    Bonham PA
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009; 36(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 19609159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison between moist swab and tissue biopsy methods for quantitation of bacteria in experimental incisional wounds.
    Bornside GH; Bornside BB
    J Trauma; 1979 Feb; 19(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 368348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Wound swab and wound biopsy yield similar culture results.
    Haalboom M; Blokhuis-Arkes MHE; Beuk RJ; Klont R; Guebitz G; Heinzle A; van der Palen J
    Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Mar; 26(2):192-199. PubMed ID: 29603518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Swab culture of purulent skin infection to detect infection or colonization with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
    Drinka P; Bonham P; Crnich CJ
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2012 Jan; 13(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 21621476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Taking a wound swab.
    Gilchrist B
    Nurs Times; 2000 Jan 27-Feb 2; 96(4 Suppl):2. PubMed ID: 10827731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Throat swab in the chronic tonsillitis: how reliable and valid is it?
    Kurien M; Stanis A; Job A; Brahmadathan ; Thomas K
    Singapore Med J; 2000 Jul; 41(7):324-6. PubMed ID: 11026798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Infected pressure sores: comparison of methods for bacterial identification.
    Rudensky B; Lipschits M; Isaacsohn M; Sonnenblick M
    South Med J; 1992 Sep; 85(9):901-3. PubMed ID: 1523451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of two non-invasive methods of microbial analysis in surgery practice: incision swabbing and the indirect imprint technique.
    Chovanec Z; Veverkova L; Votava M; Svoboda J; Jedlicka V; Capov I
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Dec; 15(6):786-93. PubMed ID: 25478933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microbial diversity in chronic open wounds.
    Frank DN; Wysocki A; Specht-Glick DD; Rooney A; Feldman RA; St Amand AL; Pace NR; Trent JD
    Wound Repair Regen; 2009; 17(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 19320883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.