These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17014887)

  • 1. 3D shape discrimination using relative disparity derivatives.
    Vreven D
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4181-92. PubMed ID: 17014887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast sensitivity of form and motion discrimination during binocular rivalry.
    Li DF; Freeman AW; Alais D
    Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1255-63. PubMed ID: 15733958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual discrimination of local surface structure: slant, tilt, and curvedness.
    Norman JF; Todd JT; Norman HF; Clayton AM; McBride TR
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1057-69. PubMed ID: 16289208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis.
    Chen CC; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2691-702. PubMed ID: 16580041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disparity-defined objects moving in depth do not elicit three-dimensional shape constancy.
    Scarfe P; Hibbard PB
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1599-610. PubMed ID: 16364392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereoscopic shape discrimination is well preserved across changes in object size.
    Norman JF; Swindle JM; Jennings LR; Mullins EM; Beers AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 19389660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disparity curvature and the perception of three-dimensional surfaces.
    Rogers B; Cagenello R
    Nature; 1989 May; 339(6220):135-7. PubMed ID: 2716833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discriminating depth in corrugated stereo surfaces: facilitation by a pedestal is explained by removal of uncertainty.
    Georgeson MA; Yates TA; Schofield AJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2321-8. PubMed ID: 18682260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stereopsis and aging.
    Norman JF; Norman HF; Craft AE; Walton CL; Bartholomew AN; Burton CL; Wiesemann EY; Crabtree CE
    Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(23-24):2456-65. PubMed ID: 18771680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different hue coding underlying figure segregation and region detection tasks.
    Nagai T; Uchikawa K
    J Vis; 2009 Aug; 9(9):14.1-19. PubMed ID: 19761347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stereo channels with different temporal frequency tunings.
    Lee S; Shioiri S; Yaguchi H
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 17184805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coarse-fine dichotomies in human stereopsis.
    Wilcox LM; Allison RS
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(22):2653-65. PubMed ID: 19520102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Configuration stereopsis: a new look at the depth-disparity relation.
    Richards W
    Spat Vis; 2009; 22(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 19055889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pooling signals from vertically and non-vertically orientation-tuned disparity mechanisms in human stereopsis.
    Patel SS; Bedell HE; Sampat P
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 16129469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cortical dynamics of figure-ground segmentation: shine-through.
    Francis G
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(1):140-63. PubMed ID: 18950655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fixation disparity at different viewing distances and the preferred viewing distance in a laboratory near-vision task.
    Jaschinski W
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Jan; 18(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 9666908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereoscopic depth perception in peripheral field and global processing of horizontal disparity gradient pattern.
    Devisme C; Drobe B; Monot A; Droulez J
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(6):753-64. PubMed ID: 18249435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The perception of motion transparency: a signal-to-noise limit.
    Edwards M; Greenwood JA
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1877-84. PubMed ID: 15797777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of direction and distance information in the perception of approach trajectory.
    Rushton SK; Duke PA
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(7):899-912. PubMed ID: 17321562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pushing the limits of transparent-motion detection with binocular disparity.
    Greenwood JA; Edwards M
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2615-24. PubMed ID: 16530242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.