739 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17014932)
1. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
Tarrant M; Knierim A; Hayes SK; Ware J
Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Dec; 26(8):662-71. PubMed ID: 17014932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
Tarrant M; Knierim A; Hayes SK; Ware J
Nurse Educ Pract; 2006 Dec; 6(6):354-63. PubMed ID: 19040902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments.
Tarrant M; Ware J
Med Educ; 2008 Feb; 42(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 18230093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High time for a change: psychometric analysis of multiple-choice questions in nursing.
Redmond SP; Hartigan-Rogers JA; Cobbett S
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2012 Nov; 9():. PubMed ID: 23192053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality assurance of item writing: during the introduction of multiple choice questions in medicine for high stakes examinations.
Ware J; Vik T
Med Teach; 2009 Mar; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 18825568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions.
Nedeau-Cayo R; Laughlin D; Rus L; Hall J
J Nurses Prof Dev; 2013; 29(2):52-7; quiz E1-2. PubMed ID: 23657034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the psychometric properties of three- and four-option multiple-choice questions in nursing assessments.
Tarrant M; Ware J
Nurse Educ Today; 2010 Aug; 30(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 20053488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.
Collins J
Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 16549616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flaws of Multiple Choice Questions in Teacher-Constructed Nursing Examinations: A Pilot Descriptive Study.
Hijji BM
J Nurs Educ; 2017 Aug; 56(8):490-496. PubMed ID: 28787072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing and evaluating innovative items for the NCLEX: Part 2, item characteristics and cognitive processing.
Wendt A; Harmes JC
Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 19412048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
Downing SM
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The evaluation of students' reflective writing for evidence of critical thinking.
Kennison MM
Nurs Educ Perspect; 2006; 27(5):269-73. PubMed ID: 17036685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of linguistic modification on ESL students' comprehension of nursing course test items.
Bosher S; Bowles M
Nurs Educ Perspect; 2008; 29(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 18575241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating reflective writing for appropriateness, fairness, and consistency.
Kennison MM; Misselwitz S
Nurs Educ Perspect; 2002; 23(5):238-42. PubMed ID: 12483814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to read and really use an item analysis.
McGahee TW; Ball J
Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(4):166-71. PubMed ID: 19574855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple choice questions: a literature review on the optimal number of options.
Vyas R; Supe A
Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 19004145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical thinking ability of associate, baccalaureate and RN-BSN senior students in Korea.
Shin S; Ha J; Shin K; Davis MK
Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(6):328-33. PubMed ID: 17142151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.
Dellinges MA; Curtis DA
J Dent Educ; 2017 Aug; 81(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 28765439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating the potential influence of established multiple-choice test-taking cues on item response in a pharmacotherapy board certification examination preparatory manual: a pilot study.
Gettig JP
Pharmacotherapy; 2006 Apr; 26(4):558-62. PubMed ID: 16553516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nursing students' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain.
Plaisance L; Logan C
Pain Manag Nurs; 2006 Dec; 7(4):167-75. PubMed ID: 17145491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
