These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17015109)

  • 21. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
    Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
    Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance of vertebral cancellous bone augmented with compliant PMMA under dynamic loads.
    Boger A; Bohner M; Heini P; Schwieger K; Schneider E
    Acta Biomater; 2008 Nov; 4(6):1688-93. PubMed ID: 18678533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support.
    Chen SH; Mo Lin R; Chen HH; Tsai KJ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Mar; 8():28. PubMed ID: 17349057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A cell attracting composite of lumbar fusion cage.
    Gunay B; Hasirci N; Hasirci V
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2017 Jun; 28(8):749-767. PubMed ID: 28278042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation.
    Tzermiadianos MN; Mekhail A; Voronov LI; Zook J; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):E38-43. PubMed ID: 18197089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending.
    Przybyla AS; Skrzypiec D; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1612-20. PubMed ID: 17621208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [A biomechanical study on cervical spinal posture and prior loading history affecting spinal compressive strength].
    Ma X; Li QL; Fan YG
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Nov; 42(21):1322-4. PubMed ID: 15634435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reinforcement of bone cement using zirconia fibers with and without acrylic coating.
    Kotha S; Li C; Schmid S; Mason J
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Mar; 88(4):898-906. PubMed ID: 18384160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro biomechanical comparison of cervical disk arthroplasty, ventral slot procedure, and smooth pins with polymethylmethacrylate fixation at treated and adjacent canine cervical motion units.
    Adamo PF; Kobayashi H; Markel M; Vanderby R
    Vet Surg; 2007 Dec; 36(8):729-41. PubMed ID: 18067613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. B-twin expandable spinal spacer for posterior lumbar interbody stabilization: mechanical testing.
    Folman Y; Shabat S; Gepstein R
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2006; 15(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 17313932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of side holes in cervical fusion cages: a finite element analysis study.
    Aslani FJ; Hukins DW; Shepherd DE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Oct; 225(10):986-92. PubMed ID: 22204120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cement augmentation of vertebral screws enhances the interface strength between interbody device and vertebral body.
    Tan JS; Bailey CS; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 17268265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neural space and biomechanical integrity of the developing cervical spine in compression.
    Nuckley DJ; Van Nausdle JA; Eck MP; Ching RP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E181-7. PubMed ID: 17413458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages.
    Wang M; Dalal S; Bagaria VB; McGrady LM; Rao RD
    Spine J; 2007; 7(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 17905318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Unilateral and bilateral sacropelvic fixation result in similar construct biomechanics.
    Tomlinson T; Chen J; Upasani V; Mahar A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2127-33. PubMed ID: 18794753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with cancellous allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Liao JC; Niu CC; Chen WJ; Chen LH
    Int Orthop; 2008 Oct; 32(5):643-8. PubMed ID: 17639386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.
    Miyanji F; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fabrication and characterization of carbon nanotube reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites.
    Yu S; Juay YK; Young MS
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2008 Apr; 8(4):1852-7. PubMed ID: 18572586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Anterior decompression and interbody fusion with BAK/C for cervical disc degenerative disorders.
    Wang X; Chen Y; Chen D; Yuan W; Chen X; Zhou X; Xiao J; Ni B; Jia L
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 19494742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.