BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17016484)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer.
    Griebsch I; Brown J; Boggis C; Dixon A; Dixon M; Easton D; Eeles R; Evans DG; Gilbert FJ; Hawnaur J; Kessar P; Lakhani SR; Moss SM; Nerurkar A; Padhani AR; Pointon LJ; Potterton J; Thompson D; Turnbull LW; Walker LG; Warren R; Leach MO;
    Br J Cancer; 2006 Oct; 95(7):801-10. PubMed ID: 17016484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
    JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should women with a BRCA1/2 mutation aged 60 and older be offered intensified breast cancer screening? - A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Obdeijn IM; Oosterwijk JC; Feenstra TL; Houssami N; de Bock GH
    Breast; 2019 Jun; 45():82-88. PubMed ID: 30904701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Women at Familial Risk.
    Geuzinge HA; Obdeijn IM; Rutgers EJT; Saadatmand S; Mann RM; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RAEM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Lobbes MBI; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Ausems MGEM; Loo CE; Wesseling J; Luiten EJT; Zonderland HM; Verhoef C; Heijnsdijk EAM; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA; de Koning HJ;
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32729887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.
    Cott Chubiz JE; Lee JM; Gilmore ME; Kong CY; Lowry KP; Halpern EF; McMahon PM; Ryan PD; Gazelle GS
    Cancer; 2013 Mar; 119(6):1266-76. PubMed ID: 23184400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).
    Leach MO; Boggis CR; Dixon AK; Easton DF; Eeles RA; Evans DG; Gilbert FJ; Griebsch I; Hoff RJ; Kessar P; Lakhani SR; Moss SM; Nerurkar A; Padhani AR; Pointon LJ; Thompson D; Warren RM;
    Lancet; 2005 May 21-27; 365(9473):1769-78. PubMed ID: 15910949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of MRI for breast cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
    Pataky R; Armstrong L; Chia S; Coldman AJ; Kim-Sing C; McGillivray B; Scott J; Wilson CM; Peacock S
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Jul; 13():339. PubMed ID: 23837641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of costs and benefits of breast cancer screening with mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI.
    Feig S
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2011 Mar; 38(1):179-96, ix. PubMed ID: 21419333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers after risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
    Fakkert IE; Jansen L; Meijer K; Kok T; Oosterwijk JC; Mourits MJ; de Bock GH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Aug; 129(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 21373873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.
    Lee JM; McMahon PM; Kong CY; Kopans DB; Ryan PD; Ozanne EM; Halpern EF; Gazelle GS
    Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 20177093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and in women at high risk for breast cancer: MR imaging and mammographic features.
    Gilbert FJ; Warren RM; Kwan-Lim G; Thompson DJ; Eeles RA; Evans DG; Leach MO;
    Radiology; 2009 Aug; 252(2):358-68. PubMed ID: 19703879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surveillance of Women with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation by Using Biannual Automated Breast US, MR Imaging, and Mammography.
    van Zelst JCM; Mus RDM; Woldringh G; Rutten MJCM; Bult P; Vreemann S; de Jong M; Karssemeijer N; Hoogerbrugge N; Mann RM
    Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):376-388. PubMed ID: 28609204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intensive Surveillance with Biannual Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Downstages Breast Cancer in
    Guindalini RSC; Zheng Y; Abe H; Whitaker K; Yoshimatsu TF; Walsh T; Schacht D; Kulkarni K; Sheth D; Verp MS; Bradbury AR; Churpek J; Obeid E; Mueller J; Khramtsova G; Liu F; Raoul A; Cao H; Romero IL; Hong S; Livingston R; Jaskowiak N; Wang X; Debiasi M; Pritchard CC; King MC; Karczmar G; Newstead GM; Huo D; Olopade OI
    Clin Cancer Res; 2019 Mar; 25(6):1786-1794. PubMed ID: 30154229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Five screening-detected breast cancer cases in initially disease-free BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers.
    Shimada S; Yoshida R; Nakashima E; Kitagawa D; Gomi N; Horii R; Takeuchi S; Ashihara Y; Kita M; Akiyama F; Ohno S; Saito M; Arai M
    Breast Cancer; 2019 Nov; 26(6):846-851. PubMed ID: 30980249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer detection and tumor characteristics in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
    Krammer J; Pinker-Domenig K; Robson ME; Gönen M; Bernard-Davila B; Morris EA; Mangino DA; Jochelson MS
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jun; 163(3):565-571. PubMed ID: 28343309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRI breast screening in high-risk women: cancer detection and survival analysis.
    Evans DG; Kesavan N; Lim Y; Gadde S; Hurley E; Massat NJ; Maxwell AJ; Ingham S; Eeles R; Leach MO; ; Howell A; Duffy SW
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jun; 145(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 24687378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Which screening strategy should be offered to women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations? A simulation of comparative cost-effectiveness.
    de Bock GH; Vermeulen KM; Jansen L; Oosterwijk JC; Siesling S; Dorrius MD; Feenstra T; Houssami N; Greuter MJ
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Apr; 108(8):1579-86. PubMed ID: 23579217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.
    Warner E; Plewes DB; Hill KA; Causer PA; Zubovits JT; Jong RA; Cutrara MR; DeBoer G; Yaffe MJ; Messner SJ; Meschino WS; Piron CA; Narod SA
    JAMA; 2004 Sep; 292(11):1317-25. PubMed ID: 15367553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relevance and efficacy of breast cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers above 60 years: a national cohort study.
    Saadatmand S; Vos JR; Hooning MJ; Oosterwijk JC; Koppert LB; de Bock GH; Ausems MG; van Asperen CJ; Aalfs CM; Gómez Garcia EB; Meijers-Heijboer H; Hoogerbrugge N; Piek M; Seynaeve C; Verhoef C; Rookus M; Tilanus-Linthorst MM;
    Int J Cancer; 2014 Dec; 135(12):2940-9. PubMed ID: 24789418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.