These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17017047)
1. 2005 employment decisions under the ADA Title I--survey update. Allbright AL Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2006; 30(4):492-5. PubMed ID: 17017047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. 2006 employment decisions under the ADA Title I--survey update. Allbright AL Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2007; 31(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 17691529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. 2007 employment decisions under the ADA Title I--survey update. Allbright AL Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2008; 32(3):335-8. PubMed ID: 18680892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. 2001 employment decisions under the ADA Title I--survey update. Allbright AL Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2002; 26(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 12116522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. 2009 employment decisions under the ADA Title I--survey update. Allbright AL Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2010; 34(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 20695416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 2002 employment decisions under the ADA Title I--survey update. Allbright AL Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2003; 27(3):387-9. PubMed ID: 14618840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. 2004 employment decisions under the ADA Title I--survey update. Allbright AL Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2005; 29(4):513-6. PubMed ID: 16224897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Heterodoxy, iconoclasm and spuriousness: the limits of novel expert evidence. Freckelton I J Law Med; 2007 Dec; 15(3):323-36. PubMed ID: 18251417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony. Merlino ML; Murray CI; Richardson JT Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 18344168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Occupational health physicians and tribunals. Williams A Occup Med (Lond); 2007 Dec; 57(8):610. PubMed ID: 18045979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of eyewitness expert evidence and judicial instruction on juror ability to evaluate eyewitness testimony. Martire KA; Kemp RI Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 18597165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Policy and practice implications of epidemiological surveys on co-occurring mental and substance use disorders. Clark HW; Power AK; Le Fauve CE; Lopez EI J Subst Abuse Treat; 2008 Jan; 34(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 17574794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Battered women who kill: the impact of expert testimony and empathy induction in the courtroom. Plumm KM; Terrance CA Violence Against Women; 2009 Feb; 15(2):186-205. PubMed ID: 19126834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Keeping the law on your side. Evans DG Bus Health; 1988 Jul; 5(9):16-7. PubMed ID: 10318101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Possibilities and limits of medical graphology: determination of current status and perspectives (III)]. Ludewig R; Dettweiler C; Lewinson TS Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1993 Feb; 48(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 8465546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence. Levett LM; Kovera MB Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 17940854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]